This is topic It wasn't a particularly dark or stormy night in forum The Library at TMO Talk.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.themoononline.com/cgi-bin/Forum/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=001251

Posted by dang65 (Member # 102) on :
 
Right, I've actually finished a cheesy, cliche-ridden short story and thrown it at the web via "save as web page" in Word. That's how much belief I have in it.

Synopsis: It's a scary ghost story for the long Autumn evenings.

Disclaimer: It's extremely unlikely to scare anyone. At all. Sorry. It's just that I don't tend to finish stories and I had to celebrate somehow.
 
Posted by froopyscot (Member # 178) on :
 
As a diversion, I wandered from Dang's document onto the rest of his web site, and on account of having read his H2G2 entry, I feel the Land Rover must be the most practical and logical vehicle produced anywhere ever.

I would go out and buy one today, in my Stepford Wifeish haze, except that they don't sell the Defender here anyway.
 
Posted by jnhoj (Member # 286) on :
 
Dang youve turned me gay :/

 -
 
Posted by jnhoj (Member # 286) on :
 
i rather hope thats you and not one of your sons ;D
 
Posted by dervish (Member # 727) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jnhoj:
Dang youve turned me gay :/

 -

I wish the pic was you.

And not that bloke with the hair bands from a while back who was accosted at a bus stop.

I would 'convert you'. As in

like hetero.

Or maybe not. (Depends if you look like the bloke in the pic.)

Or not.

As in can't be arsed - who can? - to follow the link, which leaves the logical progression of my thought processes impeccable....


Post Scrotum: ieSpell coreects your name as unhook.

Neat, oh dishelleved speller of tmoooooo.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
++++++++++ CONTAINS SPOILERS OF DANG'S STORY +++++++++

Well! I rather enjoyed your story, Dang. I thought a lot of the incidental detail was good (ie. the cricket match stuff and the prehistory of the rose) and I liked the 'futureshock' twist - though I don't think it was sustained too well once you tried to follow it through - and the 1937 opening segment seems completely adrift from the rest of the story.

Don't just fall back on lame self-disparagement, though. With a bit of reworking you could have a really quite effective riff on the traditional 'ghost-in-time' yarn.

My recommendations, for what they're worth:

Anyway. I hope that's of some use.

[ 20.10.2004, 06:48: Message edited by: ben ]
 
Posted by Raz (Member # 449) on :
 
+++BEN HAS POSTED SPOILERS+++

+++IN THE PAST+++

+++OH+++
 
Posted by dang65 (Member # 102) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
I hope that's of some use.

Ben, I really appreciate your comments and suggestions and will get some suitable editing going. I did have doubts about the 1937 bit and will probably re-do it completely. It's meant to set up the circle of the story, but it's somewhat weak. I think I was just a bit over excited at having actually completed a story.
 
Posted by jnhoj (Member # 286) on :
 
sorry dang, I will try to post something constructive about your story too but going by the "constructive" criticism I've been awful at giving in fiction writing, don't hold out for much :/

And dervish, you are even more incomprehensible than me, well done! And you must have been lurking forever. / troll.
 


copyright TMO y2k+

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.6.1