This is topic May the nineteenth be with you... in forum The Library at TMO Talk.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.themoononline.com/cgi-bin/Forum/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=001495

Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
Is anyone going to see Star Wars Episode III a week on Thursday? I've just booked my tickets for an 00.35 showing...

"Lucas manages to turn the audience's familiarity to his advantage: like a jigsaw puzzle whose final form has always been known, the fun is in discovering how the last pieces fit."
Newsweek | David Ansen

"Revenge Of The Sith strings a complex plot onto a framework of practically non-stop action."
BBC | Paul Arendt

"A rousing and tragic sendoff to a beloved franchise, and the best installment in the Star Wars series since 1980's The Empire Strikes Back."
ReelViews | James Berardinelli

"So sound in its construction and...[its] space-operatic catharsis that even the nitpickiest fanboy will likely adopt a humbly mumbled "All is forgiven" as a daily mantra."
Groucho Reviews | Peter Canavese

"Goodbye, Star Wars, and thanks for everything. It's been a wonderful ride."
ReelTalk Movie Reviews | Jeffrey Chen

"Lucas pays off the most elaborate setup in film history."
About.com | Jurgen Fauth

"Mercifully, Revenge Of The Sith is (deep sigh) light-years ahead of the turgid Menace and the undercooked Clones."
Empire Magazine [UK] | Colin Kennedy

"Energetic and character-driven, Revenge of the Sith, which is both mythic and contempo in its politics, ends with a bang, obliterating the bad taste left by Episodes I & II."
EmanuelLevy.Com | Emanuel Levy

"Believe the hype. Sith is the crowning achievement of the Star Wars mythos."
Gazette (MD) | Jeffrey Lyles

"Whatever one thought of the previous two installments, this dynamic picture irons out most of the problems, and emerges as the best in the overall series since The Empire Strikes Back."
Variety | Todd McCarthy

"A triumph for George Lucas, this is the film we've all been waiting for."
Trades | Jim Pappas

"Will be remembered as one of the greatest movies ever made. 'Classic' isn't kind enough a word for this gem. The best film to be unleashed onto the public in 25 years!"
Juicy Cerebellum | Alex Sandell
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Is Jar-Jar Binks in it?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
yes, but he has no dialog
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
yes, but he has no dialog

Darryn: you are truly the Guvnor.

Mask: you might enjoy this snippet from a thread on TheForce.net:

quote:
We've known for a couple weeks now that Jar Jar's lines have been cut. Originally, he had greeted the Jedi and/or Padme after the Space Battle and then tripped onto the Chancellor. I think at one point only the trip was cut.

But now the fact that this is cut is all but confirmed with the reviews we've gotten from users and Kevin Smith and Time and maybe others.

What was Lucas thinking? I've always thought of Lucas wanting to make his own story that he has in his head. I think he is lying to himself in respect to removing Jar Jar's lines. What a wuss!

What was the point of including Jar Jar so much in TPM if only to brush him off at the end as a character less important than Fang Zarr?

Does Lucas truly think that Revenge of the Sith has no place for Jar Jar Binks?


 
Posted by Good Fairy (Member # 479) on :
 
Jeeeesus fnucking Chris.....
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
"Mercifully, Revenge Of The Sith is (deep sigh) light-years ahead of the turgid Menace and the undercooked Clones."
Empire Magazine [UK] | Colin Kennedy

That's fucking odd. I don't recall Empire using the words 'turgid' or 'undercooked' in either of their rave reviews for TPM or AOTC.

Lets see what those bastaireds actually said...

TPM
quote:
the film's centrepiece - the Podrace, a stunning melding of digital dexterity and editing pizzazz that renders The Matrix positively arthritic. Pulled by giant engines, a grid of wonderfully exotic speed demons take on Anakin through the perilous terrain of Tatooine rockery - little in recent cinematic memory has fuelled the blood so furiously. Between the pixels, Lucas juggles strangely moving interludes - Anakin's mother Shmi (Pernilla August) saying goodbye to her son, Amidala giving comfort to Anakin - with epic action building to the three way 'saber standoff between Jinn, Kenobi and Maul where the opera of The Phantom fulfils the mythic stature it always promised.
AOTC
quote:
In 1999, this very magazine awarded The Phantom Menace four stars. Going by that rationale, Attack of the Clones deserves, oh, twenty. Pity we can only give five. OK, Clones isn't the greatest film ever. It's not even the greatest Star Wars film ever, falling short of close relative The Empire Strikes Back. Yet it outstrips TPM completely, gives Return of the Jedi a run for its money and Steven Spielberg thinks it's better than A New Hope. Make no mistake, Star Wars is back.
Unless someone trustworthy like Benway gives Revenge of the Shiznit a good review, there's no way I'm going to be suckered yet again by Count Looku of the 8 Chins.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
I think the climax of the movie should've been Obi Wan duelling to the death with Anakin/Vader, while Binks was trying to do some DIY in the background. Every time there was a tense exchange or a dramatic parry they could cut to Binks hitting his thumb with a hammer or dropping a pot of paste on Yoda's head (Yoda would be helping, of course, wearing little white overalls) And at the end of the fight scene, just as it looked like curtains for Darth, Binks walks past with a plank on his shoulder, Yoda whistles, Binks performs an about-turn clocking Obi Wan on the head and Vader finishes him off.

I would've really liked that.
 
Posted by scrawny (Member # 113) on :
 
S'quite exciting though, isn't it? As far as actual plotlines go, this installment can only be rivalled by Empire.... . Even Lucas can't fuck it up. Can he?

ETA Mask UR George Lucas AICM5pouns...

[ 10.05.2005, 07:58: Message edited by: scrawny ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scrawny:
Even Lucas can't fuck it up. Can he?

The only aspects of the film that really worry me are:

 
Posted by scrawny (Member # 113) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:

Hayden & Natalie's acting

Having just seen Shattered Glass, I would like to testify that Christianson (sp?) can indeed act, and his impression of someone unable to peform this most basic of skills in Episode 2 was merely...acting.

Edit - I am dense sometimes. Or maybe I just blocked TPM from my brain.

[ 10.05.2005, 08:55: Message edited by: scrawny ]
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
Fair do's - his impersonation of a 6yo in Ep 1 was pretty impressive.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Anakin's a tough one. The little munchkin they got to play him in the first movie was foul. Chriastaianasena has to bridge the gap between that and Prowse-in-a-helmet/James Earl Jones. Maybe he's just very, very scared.

I wonder if they make him talk a bit deeper in this movie? Or maybe they put the Vader voice-change down to the helmet.
 
Posted by Meg (Member # 444) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
The only aspects of the film that really worry me are:

I can totally see where you're coming from. Hamill, Fisher and Ford were real Oscar contenders.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
On a slight tangent, I seem to recall that someone once created an edit of TPM which contained virtually no scenes of Jar Jar at all. Does anyone know if this is true, and if so whether it is available for download at all?
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Meg:
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
The only aspects of the film that really worry me are:
  • Hayden & Natalie's acting

I can totally see where you're coming from. Hamill, Fisher and Ford were real Oscar contenders.
Right...

But people won't be watching RotS through the rose-tinted spectacles of TIME.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ringo:
On a slight tangent, I seem to recall that someone once created an edit of TPM which contained virtually no scenes of Jar Jar at all. Does anyone know if this is true, and if so whether it is available for download at all?

I was talking about this with my new semi-celeb pal "Mark Kermode" the other day. Neither of us had seen the Phantom Edit so we thought it might be a myth, but agreed that right now it would be even easier than it was in 1999 to create such an edit -- so the myth, if it is one, could become true.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
Does Mark Kermode smell of pomade ?
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
Misc, where are you taking your reviews from? I read some on the BBC yesterday that were slightly less gushing. At least 50% mentioned oak-flavoured acting.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
Does Mark Kermode smell of pomade ?

I know what you're saying. He looks like a right bruiser but I soon had him, in his words, "on the ropes." Our battle of the cult studs should be screened on BBC2 The Culture Show this Thurs. I hope I'm not awful on it or will regret mentioning it.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
Misc, where are you taking your reviews from? I read some on the BBC yesterday that were slightly less gushing. At least 50% mentioned oak-flavoured acting.

Oh yeah... I made them all up. Sorry!
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
I used to really like Mark Kermode during my brief I fancy them for their mind not their body phase during first year at uni (see also short, bespectacled poetry tutor). Does he still bang on about The Exorcist?
 
Posted by Vanilla Online Persona (Member # 301) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
Does Mark Kermode smell of pomade ?

I have heard tell of pomade - what is it? is it some sort of fancy european drink ?
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
Our battle of the cult studs should be screened on BBC2 The Culture Show this Thurs. I hope I'm not awful on it or will regret mentioning it.

*

quote:
Crime writer Ed McBain on turning real life into fiction, and on his own battle with cancer. Plus the best of British sculpture on display in rural Sussex, and the mysterious new game that's got players around the world competing for clues. Presented by Mariella Frostrup.
???
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Don't ask me.*

quote:
We talk to crime writer Ed McBain. Plus why the best of British sculpture can be found in the heart of the Sussex countryside, and Mark Kermode on whether Star Wars represents the dark side of movie-making.


 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
Does he still bang on about The Exorcist?

My God does he ever. There were some exchanges TMO readers might find amusing, but that I think were cut to include tighter, more on-topic discussion: where Kermode called Star Wars childish and I told him he'd reviewed Batman and Robin as a "delightful romp" and listed Mary Poppins in the top 5 films of all time, and when he criticised Star Wars for ripping off and cheapening classic arthouse SF, to which I replied that he openly preferred Clooney's Solaris to Tarkovsky's.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
so basically you were teh same on telly as you are on here?
bonza!
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Yes you would be proud. I hope they haven't cut it all down, or cut it out entirely, or that I don't look a total thalido. I had this space-Nazi type hairdo and a shiny canary-yellow silk handkerchief poking out of my jacket pocket.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
oh do stop worrying you big gayer.
you savaged kermode.

most people would be happy with that.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
 -

How could you not love Kermode?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Wow. He uses a lot of foundation.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Wow. He uses a lot of foundation.

On his face, or in his discussion?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
He looks like a hybrid human/spitting-image-puppet.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
...and what happened to those classy sideboards he used to sport so proudly?
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
They've gone grey.

I haven't watched TPM or AOTC for a while, but am I right in saying that the entire collapse of the Republic is down to Jar Jar Binks? Doesn't he vote in powers for the Emperor or something. I'm going to watch AOTC again this week, but may avoid going to the first few showings of ROTS as I just got really upset by the Comic Book Guy types that punched the air and cheered when Yoda started doing cartwheels - I thought it looked shit.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
isn't there a female yoda?
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
isn't there a female yoda?

There is, and get this: Her name is *Yaddle...

 -
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
She looks like Mark Kermode.
 
Posted by Mikie (Member # 783) on :
 
Me and a few friends will be ordering in the pizzas, getting the packets of crisps ready and sitting down to start a star wars marathon.

Watching episodes 1 and 2 back to back at home (with crisps pizza and possibly beer in tow) Then walking to cinema watching episode 3, walking home (picking up more pizza on way) to watch the original trilogy back to back.

Am yet undecided as to weather include the clone wars animated series in there as well.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mikie:
Am yet undecided as to weather include the clone wars animated series in there as well.

You might as well make a proper night of it...

 -  -  -
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Thinking about Misc's thread title... they really should've released this movie on the 4th, shouldn't they?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
yes there is Doc D, I belive she was called 'The Queen Mother' although sadly she passed away a while ago..
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Thinking about Misc's thread title... they really should've released this movie on the 4th, shouldn't they?

Impossible! They're still trying to perfect Emperor Palpatine's CGI wrinkles. They could've used latex like they did in the 80s, but that's no longer enough for George...
 
Posted by Mikie (Member # 783) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
quote:
Originally posted by Mikie:
Am yet undecided as to weather include the clone wars animated series in there as well.

You might as well make a proper night of it...

 -  -  -

Oh dear god.... is it bad that im tempted just to see what their like [Eek!]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Remember Generation Jedi too, if you want to see me with another hairdo.

And Star Wars Holiday Special for completists, surely. I have it on "divx" or something.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
Remember Generation Jedi too, if you want to see me with another hairdo.

Any objections to me taking screen grabs and creating a Kovacs Fan-Site?

:cannot-decide-which-faece-to-use:
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mikie:
Oh dear god.... is it bad that im tempted just to see what their like [Eek!]

Y..you don't remember Droids - The animated adventures of R2D2 and C3P0, starring the actual Anthony Daniels?

[Wink]
 
Posted by ralph (Member # 773) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
Y..you don't remember Droids - The animated adventures of R2D2 and C3P0, starring the actual Anthony Daniels?

[Wink]

Sadly, I do. Didn't "Droids" chronicle the adventures of C-3PO and R2-D2 before their lives are changed forever by the arrival of Luke Skywalker?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
If it did, that was a bit misguided as their lives were thoroughly eventful before they ever met Luke Skywalker -- both of them were involved in several galactic battles and epoch-shaping moments during the Prequel Trilogy.
 
Posted by ralph (Member # 773) on :
 
Still, you can't argue that their lives were changed forever after meeting Skywalker. Who am I kidding? Of course you can. [Razz]
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
Did Jabba feature in one episode? Or did I miss-remember that. I remember something about a giant robot god or gangster or something shit like that.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Benny the Ball:
Did Jabba feature in one episode? Or did I miss-remember that. I remember something about a giant robot god or gangster or something shit like that.

Jabba appears briefly in the Podrace scene of Episode I, but I think you're getting a bit mixed up with your "robot god", etc.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ralph:
Still, you can't argue that their lives were changed forever after meeting Skywalker. Who am I kidding? Of course you can. [Razz]

Lives, eh? I wonder if a droid can be considered to have a life?

More of a life than someone who spends part of his Tuesday evening posting about Star Wars on a message board, Misc...

A lifespan, perhaps - as you might describe the working existence of, say, a washing machine - but a life?

Stop it, Misc. This is neither the time nor the place. They don't serve your kind here.

[ 10.05.2005, 16:07: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
I never understood caravan of courage or ewok adventure - RotJ always implied to me that Ewoks and Humans hadn't mingled before, but they were set before star wars or around that time or something.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Look at this and fucking envy me. A pal of mine in the US mentioned, in a recent email, that Kelloggs had been issuing Sith spoons. Get me one, I said light-heartedly. Today he sent me one in a Jiffy bag.

My cereal will be TEH PWN3D

---------------------

When I met you, I was but a learner.

 -

vhsssssh

 -

Now I am the master.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
you know. if anyone wants one of these. i can probably get them for you.
i may even send the cereal with it.

then you can battle kovacs at the breakfast table.
and pop his "i'm the master" bubble.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
you know. if anyone wants one of these. i can probably get them for you.
i may even send the cereal with it.

then you can battle kovacs at the breakfast table.
and pop his "i'm the master" bubble.

http://www.kelloggs.com/promotions/starwars/
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
I'd love one.

I upset everyone at work by opening several packets of Corn Flakes to get the lightsabres they are giving away with them at the moment. Managed to nab Darth's Yoda's and Mace's before I was asked to stop.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
This is even more TEH LICK.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
checkit
 
Posted by Meg (Member # 444) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
quote:
Originally posted by Meg:
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
The only aspects of the film that really worry me are:
  • Hayden & Natalie's acting

I can totally see where you're coming from. Hamill, Fisher and Ford were real Oscar contenders.
Right...

But people won't be watching RotS through the rose-tinted spectacles of TIME.

Crap acting is part of the reason I find SW so enjoyable, hence the sarcasm. The thought that people might want them to act 'properly' is, to me, just a wee bit strange and out of sync with what most of the lead actors have done in all the SW films.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Meg:
Crap acting is part of the reason I find SW so enjoyable, hence the sarcasm. The thought that people might want them to act 'properly' is, to me, just a wee bit strange and out of sync with what most of the lead actors have done in all the SW films.

Well there has been some proper acting: Tarkin, Dooku, Palpatine, Kenobi (I), Kenobi (II)...

[ 11.05.2005, 04:22: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
you know. if anyone wants one of these. i can probably get them for you.

I'd be happier than you could possibly imagine if one of these landed on my doorstep. Do I get to choose the colour?

quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
then you can battle kovacs at the breakfast table.
and pop his "i'm the master" bubble.

"Only a master of evil, Prof."
 
Posted by Meg (Member # 444) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Meg:
with what most of the lead actors

Well, quite.

Although, none of the characters you mentioned have been entirely devoid of ham either.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Meg:
quote:
Originally posted by Meg:
with what most of the lead actors

Well, quite.

Although, none of the characters you mentioned have been entirely devoid of ham either.

Of course. Lucas's clunky (or tongue-in-cheek?) dialog sees to that... and as you say, that's how it should be.
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
Oh Misc, are you still looking forward to this?
 
Posted by scrawny (Member # 113) on :
 
...from a woman who says a film is ok by her as long as it contains enough pictures of horses? [Wink]
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
Are there horses in Aggressive Noun of the Made Up Name?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Surely Kingdom of Heaven has some horses in it, as well as your favourite little flower of an actor.
 
Posted by scrawny (Member # 113) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
Are there horses in Aggressive Noun of the Made Up Name?

To this I cannot testify, although a quick Google would suggest not.

Misc, are there horses in Revenge of the Sith?

And in all seriousness VP, do you not like Star Wars? I would have thought that it shared enough elements with LOTR (epic journeys, a struggle between the forces of good and evil, a plucky alliance fighting to save the world, big fuck-off battle scenes, fantasical creatures, vaguely Jungian notions of Dark Sides, on-off love interest) for you to rate it. [Confused]
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
I love the original Star Wars, Scrawny. You'd have had to have been a fairly miserable kid not to enjoy them. The recent messy versions have left me cold, except for:

Liam Neeson
The nicely choreographed final fight between Obi Wan and Darth Maul
Amidala's costumes

Nothing from the second one, except a bit of Christopher Lee is always nice.

See the Film 2005 thread for my horsey review of Kingdom of Pretty Boy Heaven, kovacs.

[ 11.05.2005, 05:11: Message edited by: Vogon Poetess ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scrawny:
And in all seriousness VP, do you not like Star Wars? I would have thought that it shared enough elements with LOTR (epic journeys, a struggle between the forces of good and evil, a plucky alliance fighting to save the world, big fuck-off battle scenes, fantasical creatures, vaguely Jungian notions of Dark Sides, on-off love interest) for you to rate it. [Confused]

quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
The recent messy versions have left me cold, except for:

Liam Neeson
The nicely choreographed final fight between Obi Wan and Darth Maul
Amidala's costumes

Nothing from the second one, except a bit of Christopher Lee is always nice.

It seems that Vogon is more interested in the actors and costumes than any of the themes that Scrawny mentioned. Is this also true of her LotR fandom?

[Frown]
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
Tell us about the horses.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
There is a Jedi horse called Blaak Byoo-Tee who wields a lightsaber with her mouth. She dies early on in the film, after a strenuous duel with the mysterious Count Dooku. The following morning, Anakin wakes face to face with Blaak's disembodied head.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
The acting isn't bad in Empire Strikes Back. Star Wars is lacking some talent as so many are young nobods, except for Tarkin and Kenobi.

Jedi had terrible acting, Darth Vader is the only one with anything like acting going on.

New ones have been hammy or annoying, except for Liam Neeson in 1 and Ewan in 2. Christopher Lee is always good, but I hated Yoda's lightsabre bit too much.

Misc. the question about jabba and giant robot gods was about Droids...
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Benny the Ball:
Misc. the question about jabba and giant robot gods was about Droids...

Oh. That would make more sense, yes.
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Benny the Ball:
Jedi had terrible acting, Darth Vader is the only one with anything like acting going on.

It's a Bristolian in a suit, the voice isn't even his. You'll be telling me about the flow and context of Warwicks manouvres in the Marvin suit next, despite it just looking like a paranoid android with a midget waddle.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by New Way Of Decay:
It's a Bristolian in a suit...

 -
The Farce is strong with this one.

[ 11.05.2005, 06:27: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
NWoD, I was highlighting how bad I thought that the acting was. The only time someone made a face that conveyed anything like real emotion was the reflections of lights across Darth's helmet when he chucks the emperor down the shaft.
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
lol, I know the scene.
 
Posted by Mikie (Member # 783) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
quote:
Originally posted by Mikie:
Oh dear god.... is it bad that im tempted just to see what their like [Eek!]

Y..you don't remember Droids - The animated adventures of R2D2 and C3P0, starring the actual Anthony Daniels?

[Wink]

Alas I was a child of the 80s and anything I saw before the 90s is but a blur of a memory..... I do vaguely remember the Ewoks one though.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
misc mail me.
i'm off to the dentists in an hour, will stop at the shop and get you a packet of cereal. shall i send the cereal too?

NWOD: send me mail again, i can pick up those records and get them over to you today as well.

i just needed motivating....
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
misc mail me.

I don't think I have your address. [Frown]
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
d_marlee
@

y
a
h
o
o
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
NWOD: send me mail again, i can pick up those records and get them over to you today as well.

Oh aye will do. Let me do it now. Thanksir.
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
It keeps rejecting. I'd mail from home but my PC went gay when the electricity turned off.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
I tried @yahoo.com but it got returned, so I tried @yahoo.co.uk. I think this might have worked.

[Confused]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
*

quote:
Employers are expected to see a dramatic spike in absenteeism as workers play hooky to see "Star Wars: Episode III — Revenge of the Sith," when it opens May 19, according to a new report.

That loss of productivity could cost employers as much as $627 million in the first two days that the picture — the last installment of the epic sci-fi series — hits theaters.


 
Posted by Teflon (Member # 55) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mikie:
Alas I was a child of the 80s and anything I saw before the 90s is but a blur of a memory..... I do vaguely remember the Ewoks one though.

Vaguely!!! i still remember the theme tune!!

Altogether 'were the E-E-E-E-EEEEEEEWOKS, And were living on the forest moon'

Or summink.

OH BTW All six Star Wars movies have only thrown up one acting oscar nom. No prizes for guessing who it was for.

And no it WAS NOT Brian Blessed in episode one.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Teflon:
OH BTW All six Star Wars movies have only thrown up one acting oscar nom. No prizes for guessing who it was for.

And no it WAS NOT Brian Blessed in episode one.

 -

?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Remember gang -- 7pm tonight, BBC2!
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
You should "host" a "live web chat" by making a thread where we can all post comments and fashion/hairstyle critiques as we watch. KOVACS V KERMODE - THE GIANTS LOCK HORNS - QUIFF OR SPIKES - THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE WINNER -

etc
 
Posted by OJ (Member # 752) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
Remember gang -- 7pm tonight, BBC2!

Ah, mixed-reality gaming, Laurie Anderson and the future of British Sculpture. Fab. What's that Mark Kermode going to be talking about again ;-)
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
I love the cpation if you hover over the picture of Kermode on the Culture show website [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
I heard that Mark Komode is completely cgi-ed and that Kovacs actually conducted the debate towards a tennis ball.
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
I love the cpation if you hover over the picture of Kermode on the Culture show website [Big Grin]

That is how you have to do alt tags now. You have to be really factual and descriptive for blind users. The DDA coming into force in Oct 2005 states that we can't now say 'Girl with red hair' or something... let alone silly things like 'YOU LOVE IT YOU SLAGS'. Now you have to put 'Girl with red hair sitting at desk, wearing blouse she bought on eBay, with an empty water bottle beside her, crying on the inside because she is hungover and depressed because she recently suffered an ectopic pregnancy, but has kept this hidden from her lover because she has been pretending to be on the pill.' It is very tiresome.
 
Posted by OJ (Member # 752) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by London:
It is very tiresome.

But very accessible.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by London:
Now you have to put 'Girl with red hair sitting at desk, wearing blouse she bought on eBay, with an empty water bottle beside her, crying on the inside because she is hungover and depressed because she recently suffered an ectopic pregnancy, but has kept this hidden from her lover because she has been pretending to be on the pill.' It is very tiresome.

But who's going to bother reading all that?
Especially if they're blind..!
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
NWOD- I NEED YOUR ADDRESS.
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
But who's going to bother reading all that?
Especially if they're blind..!

Well, they don't really have to read it. They will have software which will read it out loud to them. So it's more 'listening' really. Listening to mama internet.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
How does that software work ?

OK, I understand it reads what is on the page, but how do you use a mouse if you're blind ?

So you type in say *www.bbc.co.ck* and get to the main site.
The software reads the main site and then says "Click here to go to entertainment" and then what happens ???

Have you had a go with the software ?

I think I'd have put "Mark Kermode looking smug"

But then again does a blind person know what 'smug' looks like ?

Or a desk ?

Right bag of worms really...
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
wait you already said that durr

[ 12.05.2005, 09:59: Message edited by: London ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I don't think I will let Peter from "Heat" style my hair like that again [Frown]
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
Why did you let them bleach your teeth?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Those aren't real teeth.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
They took six words from my first rehearsed 30 second pitch and spliced it together with a sentence from an hour later, ie. "Star Wars is so important because many people have taken career inspiration from Star Wars." Mongs! Never mind my Grandma said I "had a good innings" on that show, fucking hell I might as well die now I suppose.
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
You reminded me of Morrissey.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Thanks I have gone from this [Frown] ---> that [Smile]

that was a nice thing to say London.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
You were the only one that came off okay. Komododode's eye rolling was a bit much, the girl was a bit nnnggghh, and the tech guy was just that.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
EPISODE VII: CLASH OF TEH PLASTIC HAIR MEN

I didn't brief D that I was expecting you to be on this and she squealed with delight when you appeared on our tele. Overall, a good performance, and it was fairly obv. that they'd hacked your spiel into bitesize chunks.

Was Kermit deliberately going for an Alan Sugar-type vibe? I also got the impression from the woman that they'd coerced her into doing the 'Leia buns' gag - she looked mightily pissed off.

Later in the show, the Ed McBain package left me completely baffled - the bits of dialogue that were quoted were about as 'crackling' and 'hard-boiled' as puréed wolf cock.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
"Will be remembered as one of the greatest movies ever made. 'Classic' isn't kind enough a word for this gem. The best film to be unleashed onto the public in 25 years!"
Juicy Cerebellum | Alex Sandell

'Juicy Cerebellum', forsooth! Hum. The Guardian's usually fairly reliable Bradshaw gives it one star.

quote:
As an actor Christensen must show the terrible embryo of future wickedness within himself. And how does he do this? By tilting his head down, looking up through lowered brows and giving the unmistakable impression that he is very, very cross. If Princess Diana had gone to the Dark Side, she would have looked a lot like this.
Oh dear! Caution, young Jedi, that review contains spoilers - though you probably all know the script back-to-front anyway.

Next!
 
Posted by scrawny (Member # 113) on :
 
Kovacs we thought you were great - you came a cross as mich more intelligent than Kermode who looked like a small child pretending to be Dr Evil, sticking his fingers into his ears and going 'laa la laaa I hate Star Wars I don't care what you say look I can't hear you laa laa laaaaa' every time anyone said anything valid.

Eejit.

ETA God that review is depressing Ben [Frown]

[ 13.05.2005, 04:57: Message edited by: scrawny ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
I thought you came across pretty well, Kovacs. K'mode made himself look stupid with his refusal to respond to anyone's argument with more than a:

"Hmm, whatever" *Shrugs*

quote:
Let's see if anyone can convince me that Star Wars isn't shit.

Well? Hmm?

No, it's shit. I don't necessarily think you're all wankers of the highest order anymore, but it's still shit. So there.

I'll have a look at Episode III, because it might be better, but...

I know it won't.

Or to put it another way: What Scr'orny said. I found it interesting that the guests weren't allowed to sit down. not sure if this was down to a lack of funding at the BBC, or some kind of inferiority complex on the part of K'mode.

Sidenote:
I hadn't realised that you'd morphed into an elongated Jimmy Somerville in the years since I last saw you!

[ 13.05.2005, 05:23: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Thanks I appreciate these nice comments! It seems I look like a camp 80s frontman on television. It was all absurdly artificial for a "debate" -- even at the time, our spontaneous discussion had to be reproduced in chunks again, and they cut even the chunks up into mini-chunks, out of sequence and interrupted by mini-mini clips. Every shot in that 7 minute section was probably 2 seconds.

I think Kermode was certainly deliberately mugging and playing a pantomime role, in fairness to him.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
I caught the girl with the buns and the other guy so I missed our KO by mere minutes, shame as I was going to digitally alter the sound for TMO style fun but I missed him..

THEN I fell asleep before the repeat, Commode did act like a prize 'dippity bix' though just because he dosn't like Star Wars..

I bet he's waiting for the Quantum leap movie
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Lol "fame" beckons, I am getting dissed on Barbelith's ROTS thread by someone who doesn't even know me from Barbelith.
 
Posted by Bandy (Member # 12) on :
 
I thought you looked a bit like a Bond villain. [Cool]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Remember gang -- The Scotsman newspaper on Saturday is the next highlight in this week of "glory".
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
Kovacs - you got Hotdog this month? It's got a big batman thing in it, and the fitasfuck mrs Fantastic Alba on the cover.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
No I have not, but thank you. [Smile]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
OMG!!! What have they done to Natalie Portman?!

 -

[Eek!]

At the end of RotS, Anakin shows off his MadSaberSkillz by close-shaving Padmé. Master Yoda sits at the Jedi Council watching holographic footage of Anakin's work:

 -
"Shaven, Senator Amidala may be, but as attractive, she no longer is. Shaving leads to stubble. Stubble leads to itching. Itching leads to... The Dark Side!"

 -
"Anakin has gone too far this time. Only the influence of the Sith could cause him to act this way."

 -
"For a suitable hairpiece, we must look."
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I think we all know this is for V For Vendetta.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
Kovacs = Robert Killjoy Silk.
 
Posted by herbs (Member # 101) on :
 
Dewds! Leicester Square is crawling with stormtroopers! And Jedi knights! And a Darth Vader! Though he's not quite so convincing - his cape appeared to be fashioned from a nylon bedsheet, dyed black. Not fitted, thankfully.

Word has it the Jedis were sharing an invigorating pint or two in the All Bar One. It's going to kick off!
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by herbs:
Word has it the Jedis were sharing an invigorating pint or two in the All Bar One.

Anyone in the area with a camera should take some snaps so we can laugh at the dodgy costumes and disappointingly plastic lightsabers.

Kovacs will probably pop up shortly to remind you that the plural of Jedi is simply Jedi.

Like sheep.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
"my friend doesn't like you"
"er"
"you're supposed to say "i'll be careful"
"look mate do you want a fucking pint of stella or what?"
"er. yes. please. two. and can we see the menu?"
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
 -

 -

 -

It's "he doesn't like you".
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
kovacs is becoming a bit of a feature on the Beeb, isn't he? Maybe they're grooming him as a presenter..?

I'll tell you who else is on the telly all the time (he was on that same show last night) that hairy West Country **** . He is fucking dire. He must have a mate who's a producer or something, 'cause he's not fucking funny.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
I'll tell you who else is on the telly all the time (he was on that same show last night) that hairy West Country **** . He is fucking dire. He must have a mate who's a producer or something, 'cause he's not fucking funny.

FAQ U.

 -
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
That's him. He thinks he's fucking hilarious. He constantly wears this expression like the next thing out of his mouth is going to be the funniest fucking thing ever. The only thing he could possibly say that would make me laugh is "I have AIDS of the eyes!" And only then if it was true and he had a letter from his doctor to prove it.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Sorry, this is a bit big.

 -
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
That's him.

I think you misjudge him, Mask. Away from the restrictions of primetime presenting, he can be quite amusing. Did you catch Channel 4's FAQ U, or last year's Flipside TV?

[ 16.05.2005, 11:00: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
So, are you and Chewy pals, now?

Also, I didn't know Prowse had a wonky eyeball 'til I saw that show. Is it fake? Has he had a stroke? Is it Jedi related?
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
Sorry, this is a bit big.

Fixed. [Smile]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Thanks Misc. You would like Leicester Square today.

Yes, Prowse looks like he has been in the wars alright. I didn't know where to look when I was talking to him. After a few minutes of him asking me for sales tips, I found I was really sweating from discomfort and had to go.

I didn't talk to that hairy guy.

[ 16.05.2005, 11:06: Message edited by: kovacs ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
You would like Leicester Square today.

For all you know I could be one of the Stormtroopers, secretly posting on TMO using the voice recognition software inside my shiny helmet.

Has anyone turned up dressed as a Battle Droid? An anorexic, perhaps...
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
"I didn't talk to that hairy guy."

You stuck up, scruffy looking nerf hearder.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Benny the Ball:
You stuck up, scruffy looking nerf hearder.

You'd better not have killed my thread with that post...  -  -  -

[ 16.05.2005, 11:24: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
time of death 16:30....
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:


Yes, Prowse looks like he has been in the wars alright. I didn't know where to look when I was talking to him. After a few minutes of him asking me for sales tips, I found I was really sweating from discomfort and had to go.

lol

And to think, they spunked all that money on another guy and a make-up artist when they took his helmet off.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
 -
 
Posted by jonesy999 (Member # 5) on :
 
 -

I'll never join you, you crazy kids.

 -

If you only knew the power of the dark side of the road. Tufty never told you what happened to your father.

 -

He told me enough. He told me you killed him. You told him not to look left and right.

 -

No. I am your father.

Shocked, Alvin looks at Green Cross Code Man in utter disbelief.

 -

No. No. That's not true! That's kerrazy!

 -

Search your feelings. You know it to be true.

 -
No! No! No!

 -

Alvin. You can destroy the congestion charge. Emperor Livingstone has foreseen this. It is your destiny. Join me, and together we can rule the South Circular as father and son. Come with me. It is the only way.


A calm comes over Alvin, and he makes a decision. In the next instant he steps off the pavement and into the road. The Dark Lord looks over the road and closes a gloved fist as a milk float clatters into Alvin and drags the young jedi out of sight.


God that's lame.

[ 16.05.2005, 12:51: Message edited by: jonesy999 ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Who's scruffy-looking?
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:


 -

oh dear
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
 -

"Some people will think I'm a neo-Nazi or that I have cancer or I'm a lesbian."
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
I think she looks great. Those glasses really suit her.
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
she'll be ripping up photos of the pope next


but, you know, she's still fucking pretty, i could still watch her forever

[ 17.05.2005, 07:25: Message edited by: vikram ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Anyone who hated Young Anakin... time has enabled your revenge. Check dis

 -
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
Black Mask - lol.

There's always been something wrong with her mouth (I'll avoid the obvious 'my dicks not in it' gag here - and yet still manage to use it!) something that looks as though her gums and lips are joined together that bothers me.
 
Posted by Uber Trick (Member # 456) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
Anyone who hated Young Anakin... time has enabled your revenge. Check dis

For added value, squint you eyes and pretend he has a tight pursed smile and a jaunty french moustache.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
No, wait a minute... if I squint and think "moustache" I get Charlie Chaplin. What are you thinking of?
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
I got Blakey.

'oh, I 'ate you Jar Jar'
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
When do you think was the last time he said "Yippee!" ?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
Blimey, I'd believe that kid grew up to be the Dark Sith Lord why didn't Lucas just stick with him - he could have dragged the franchise out for a few more years that way and there would have been no need for a lava fight he already needs the big black hat by the look of it...

 -

"that's better"

[ 18.05.2005, 05:23: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
Well I'm off home, and then on to the cinema for an early morning showing.

I might write a review tomorrow.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
Did somebody say on a previous page/different thread that they never hated Star Wars until these new films? I can't be bothered to read those pages to find out. Because if they did, then that's exactly how I feel on the subject. I mean, I liked Star Wars as much as the next (sane) kid but remaking the old movies and then making 3 more has kind of ruined the whole thing. I will be glad when May 19 is long long gone and we can forget about all this silliness.
 
Posted by discodamage (Member # 66) on :
 
yes.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
I liked it.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
After not contributing very much with my last comment, I will now contribute something Star Wars related.

Everyone should go and somehow acquire a copy of anything by j-something middleoftheroaders Guitar Vader. I particularly recommend the almost certainly intentionally Engrish All the people envy new my guitar.

It's not that they're necessarily good. It's just that you may or may not find it preferable to watching the new Star Wars movie. But, yeah, if it weren't for Star Wars, they wouldn't have been called Guitar Vader and we all would have been less likely to have heard of them. Unless they had been called like The Indianna Jones Family or something. So yay for Star Wars!
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
By Tatooine! I am something of a SW fan, but in the words of Han Solo, "these guys must really be desperate."

quote:
Life After Revenge of the Sith

Posted By Scott on May 16, 2005
As I walked out of a screening of Revenge of the Sith, I was left with mixed emotions. I was excited to have just seen the final prequel, but I was also sad that it was finally all over. I was left thinking, “Now what?” And as I thought about it, I realized there’s quite a bit for Star Wars fans to look forward to. So as you walk out of the theater and your eyes adjust to the light again, here are a few things to remind you that the Force will be with you….always:

- Revenge of the Sith DVD (Fall 2005) – Around October or November you can look forward to getting ROTS on DVD. It will have all sorts of deleted scenes on it and all the great “making of” features we’ve seen in the past. Look for yet another big Burger King promotion to coincide with this.


- Droids and Ewoks Series DVDs (2006?) – Sure, they already released Droids and Ewoks on DVD, but these weren’t the entire series. LFL hinted that DVDs of the entire series were in the works, but no release date was mentioned. Some time in 2006 might be a logical time to release them.

- Computer Animated Clone Wars Cartoons (2006?) – Some time late in 2006 we might be able to expect the first of the new Star Wars TV series we’ve been hearing about. Let’s not forget toys and merchandise associated with this, too.


- Star Wars Saga DVDs (2007?) – We all know they’re going to release all six Star Wars movies in one massive DVD package. The question is when will it take place and what will be on it? I’m sure Lucas will tinker with all the films again for this release. Look for all the vintage “making of” shows as well as other goodies not released before. Start saving pennies now.

- Star Wars Live Action Series (2007?) – With fans like Kevin Smith on board to contribute, Lucas looks like he’s on the right path for this already.

- Star Wars – 3-D (Unknown?) – Lucas has shown a strong commitment towards putting all six Star Wars movies back on the big screen in 3-D, so not only will old fans get to enjoy them in a new way, but young kids will get a chance to seem them the way they were meant to be seen – on the big screen. I’m sure the 3-D effects will dazzle even jaded Star Wars fans.

- Books and Comics (Ongoing) – There’s lots of stuff to look forward to in the books and comics. You’ve got James Luceno's novel set between Episodes 3 and 4 - Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader. You can probably expect books and comics featuring the TV series characters in the future, too.

- Toys and Specialty Items (Ongoing) – Not only can you continue to expect more toys from the movies, but you can probably expect more toys from the animated and live action TV series, too. Not only that, but Gentle Giant has barely even started putting out mini-busts associated with Revenge of the Sith. (Can’t wait for a General Grievous bust!)

- Video Games (Ongoing) - LucasArts has been using outside developers to produce its most recent games, and we expect this trend to continue. The games have recently centered around Star Wars, and there's now plenty of opportunities to expand that universe.


So as you can see, there’s still a lot of life in the Star Wars franchise. There are still spoiler to look forward to, adventures to keep fans entertained, and more. It doesn’t appear that Star Wars will go into carbon freeze mode like it did between Return of the Jedi and the Special Editions.

I have highlighted in bold the saddest bits and wish someone else would comment on them, because reading that just tired me out. This guy is like a real-life version of that film reviewer from the Onion -- Jackie something? Ben will know.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
Item! Jackie Harvey.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Thanks For 20 Years of Fun, George!

Item! As I walked out of a screening of Revenge of the Sith, I was left with mixed emotions. Natalie Portman's pregnancy was well-disguised in most shots, but couldn't George have used some of that Computer-Generation Imagery to hide it better? I'm "expecting" we'll see another little Portman running around soon... my money's on June. I'm sure Natalie can regain her figure by the time she shoots V for Vengeance.


 
Posted by My Name Is Joe (Member # 530) on :
 
I was impressed overall, I'd say 80% of it was 9/10 while the other 20% was 2/10.

spillers:


General Grievous was utterly pointless I thought, and the time spent chasing him could have been better used expanding on Palpatine's revelation of his Sith nature, which was a bit rushed. But the death of the Jedi and Anakin's fall were well done, as was the fight between him and Obi-wan.

But Hayden should never have been allowed near Darth Vader's suit...he's too skinny, and teen angst and Big Darth don't mix.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by My Name Is Joe:
I was impressed overall, I'd say 80% of it was 9/10 while the other 20% was 2/10.

That's a time weighted mean of 7.6 out of ten. Was it really that good? Go and listen to Guitar Vader. 90% of their stuff is 3/10 but 10% is about 9/10.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
Cheapskates can find a 1.43GB DVD-R on TorrentSpy.

Not that I'm endorsing illegal downloads or anything of the sort.

[ 19.05.2005, 06:04: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Bryan: Now you've touched on the big question, master. Which is, was this whole prequel thing a gigantic waste of time? The 16-year interregnum between Return of the Jedi and The Phantom Menace was a time of peace in the Galactic Republic. I barely thought about Star Wars. OK, not quite true. I bought three Star Wars video games. I read at least five novels, the final of which was called The Courtship of Princess Leia, about which I shall say no more. I saw the original trilogy countless times on videotape and at least twice in the theater. But given the early-1980s hysteria, it wasn't not much. Then 1999 comes along, and we get all psyched up, studying the trailers like the Zapruder film and salivating over every bit Lucas unleashes on the Internet. The first two movies were fairly wretched. And even though Revenge of the Sith was decent—decent—I can't help but feel I've sorta wasted six years of my life on this crap. A more frightening thought: If the new films mar the original trilogy, it means we wasted three decades of our lives on this crap.
Depressing!

[ 19.05.2005, 07:48: Message edited by: ben ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
quote:
...it means we wasted three decades of our lives on this crap.

Jesus Christ! It's only a bunch of movies. Some people take these things way too seriously!

[Eek!]
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
Cheapskates can find a 1.43GB DVD-R on TorrentSpy.

Not that I'm endorsing illegal downloads or anything of the sort.

Bollocks ! Lucas has enough money he don't need my cinema ticket, I'll watch the 'workprint' (with counters) to form an opinion and if it's as bad as episodes one and two I'll wait till it's on DVD and hire it to watch on Femkes dads home cinema in a month or 3..

[ 19.05.2005, 08:06: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
Bollocks !

Steady - I decided not to post the link because I didn't want to get TMO in any legal shit, Mr. WebMaster! You know how protective George can be.

quote:

Lucas has enough money he don't need my cinema ticket...

True.

From BoingBoing:
quote:
Hell, the licensing deals alone have already recouped the cost of production, before the first ticket was sold.


[ 19.05.2005, 08:07: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by discodamage (Member # 66) on :
 
george lucas hasd more money than at least 8 african countries. facked, and i mean that in both immediately understood senses of the misspelt word.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
Just booked a ticket - work has slowed down, and I have nothing to do until tomorrow now, so I'm gonna head down to the picture house, have a coffee, do the su doku and wait and see how shit it really is. As for paying, well, it's a work expense, so I don't mind going to the cinema at all.
 
Posted by Gemini (Member # 428) on :
 
If it wasn't totally illegal my plan of action would be to download it, watch it and if it was any good go to see it in the cinema.

Of course I won't be following that course of action as it is illegal.
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by discodamage:
george lucas hasd more money than at least 8 african countries. facked, and i mean that in both immediately understood senses of the misspelt word.

So what?

I really don't get teh justifications for piracy. They all seem pretty lame to me. It isn't anyone's right to watch a movie or listen to a piece of music. I hope the films companies sue each and every one of you thieves!
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by vikram:
So what?

I really don't get teh justifications for piracy. They all seem pretty lame to me. It isn't anyone's right to watch a movie or listen to a piece of music. I hope the films companies sue each and every one of you thieves!

You can't keep a good bread-head down.
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
please justify film piracy, black mask. go on. i'd like to hear your learned explantion of why it is a good thing and should go unpunished.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by vikram:
please justify film piracy, black mask. go on. i'd like to hear your learned explantion of why it is a good thing and should go unpunished.

Piracy should go unpunished because it obviously sticks in the craw of puffed-up, spoiled, over-privileged milksops who idle their time away on the backs of others. It irritates people whose idea of achievement is having an erection. It is troubling to vapid, soulless parasites who swan around wondering why there isn't someone scattering rose-petals beneath their feet.

That is why piracy should go unpunished.

Okay?
 
Posted by dang65 (Member # 102) on :
 
What I don't understand is why DVDs are cheaper than CDs even though they must take a lot more money to make, a lot more people to make, have loads of extras, bigger packaging, and last about five times longer than a standard album.

And I know that a blockbuster DVD will probably sell about fifty times more than a blockbuster album, but even rubbish, indie, straight-to-DVD DVDs are cheaper than CDs.

What really obvious factor have I completely failed to spot here?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
 -
 
Posted by Sleeper Service (Member # 314) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by vikram:
please justify film piracy, black mask. go on. i'd like to hear your learned explantion of why it is a good thing and should go unpunished.

Its about this point I would expect you to say something like

"But i bet you wouldn't go into a shop and steal an DVD/Television/Frock Hat etc"

To which my standard reply is always

"Well of course I would If I knew I could get clean away with it" which is the point really.

I am happy to steal movies and music because I can't afford to buy all of what I want and I am too lazy/stupid to get a job paying me more money.

Selfish, unpleasant attitude?

Very probably.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
That is why piracy should go unpunished.

Plus I think Steelgate said it was OK once.
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
Do you believe that piracy is KILLING THE INDUSTRY, AIDING TERRORISM AND MAKING SMALL THIRD WORLD CHILDREN CRY, Vikram? I know the ads before films would have you belive that it's a crime on a par with paedophilia and illegal immigration, but it's basically about big rich companies making a bit less money.

I usually prefer buying decent quality DVDs and watching films for proper in the cinema. I know a lot of big record companies/studios rely on a single big hit per year to fund the smaller, less popular artists/productions and that a dip in profits mean the less mainstream stuff is the first to get shelved. However, I'd make an exception for Lucas. I don't begrudge him his first crop of riches, and for being canny enough to invent movie tie-in merchandising. But I resent my pound coins helping to bloat his bank balance and ego further, in exchange for lazy, mediocre product. It just seems more personal with him somehow.

[ 19.05.2005, 09:02: Message edited by: Vogon Poetess ]
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Piracy should go unpunished because it obviously sticks in the craw of puffed-up, spoiled, over-privileged milksops who idle their time away on the backs of others. It irritates people whose idea of achievement is having an erection. It is troubling to vapid, soulless parasites who swan around wondering why there isn't someone scattering rose-petals beneath their feet.

That is why piracy should go unpunished.

Okay?

Ah, I didn't get it before. Copyright theft is an act of political / economic / cultural rebellion. By watching the latest Ron Howard shitfest, but not paying for it, I am fighting The Man.

lol

yawn
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
Plus I think Steelgate said it was OK once.

That's post of the month that is ! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
Do you believe that piracy is KILLING THE INDUSTRY, AIDING TERRORISM AND MAKING SMALL THIRD WORLD CHILDREN CRY, Vikram?

No, but I do think it is theft and call me crazy but I though stealing was wrong? Or is that too 1950s for you?

quote:
But I resent my pound coins helping to bloat his bank balance and ego further, in exchange for lazy, mediocre product.
Um, you could try not watching this lazy, mediocre product.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Man, you need to get in out of the sun.
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
quote:
No, but I do think it is theft and call me crazy but I though stealing was wrong? Or is that too 1950s for you?

Yes, it is STEALING, if you want to make it dramatically biblical. There are degrees of stealing though, from my taking blank CDs home for Thorn from the stationary cupboard through to home-breaking burglar-cnuts and Robert Maxwell. A free version of a film that's already broken even before the first ticket's sold barely raises a flicker on my Moral Outrage-ometer, I'm afraid. Also, didnt' you "steal" someone's post from here for your dissertation?

quote:
Um, you could try not watching this lazy, mediocre product.
Certainly. It's the fact that it could and should be good, and promised so much with that first "little Anakin with Vader's shadow" poster, which was the only exciting thing about the whole prequel farce.

[ 19.05.2005, 09:14: Message edited by: Vogon Poetess ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
Going back on my previous post slightly...

I don't really understand the argument that "Lucas has enough money he don't need my cinema ticket". Perhaps he does have enough moeny, but does that mean that he doesn't deserve any further takings, after the film has broken even? Would it be different if Lucasfilm were a small independent company who risked everything in making the film? Would that make it wrong to download a pirated copy?

Is it down to some sense of supporting the underdog, and despising the successful?

It's not like the film companies force people to visit the cinema or buy DVDs. People do it because they want to. Why should they be able to get it for free, just because the filmmakers are already rich? Haven't these companies earnt this money, in some sense?

I occasionally download pirated movies, music, etc.
But at least I can admit that it's wrong.

[ 19.05.2005, 09:18: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
 -
Stop! Stop! This degrading squabble over a stupid puppet show for retards is tearing us apart!
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:

I don't really understand the argument that "Lucas has enough money he don't need my cinema ticket". Would it be different if Lucasfilm were a small independent company who risked everything in making the film? Would that make it wrong to download a pirated copy?


I admit that with Lucasfilm it is different. There are plenty of absurdly rich men in the entertainment business, most of whom got their millions from enterprises far less exhilarating and imaginative than the first Star Wars. As I say though, with Lucas it seems more personal. Perhaps it's because most people have such fond memories of Star Wars from their childhood (when your parents paid for your tickets and bought toys for you), that it seems even more insulting to have to pay to witness something Good become something Bad through laziness and greed. And greed is something that is undeniably associated with Lucas, what with his unnecessary tinkering with re-releases.

To me, it's a bit rude to pirate non-mainstream stuff from struggling independent companies. With Lucas, I don't care.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
To be totally honest Misc I don't really know what I mean't by it either..


I'll 'borrow' a copy of this from online because I want to be able to discuss it here but can neither afford to go to the cinema to see it, fancy sitting around listening to strangers yak, fart and eat skittles all through it and find a baby sitter who is happy to take Beckett for a couple of hours while I watch something that will probably just leave me feeling let down..

George Lucas does have a lot of money though so I don''t feel as bad as I do for having downloaded the likes of Napoleon Dynamite and Garden State neither of which have made it to DVD in Holland or had a run at the Cinema so had I wanted to see them it would have cost me a flight or ferry to the UK plus the cost of a ticket..

(As we were there last Sunday I know that works out to 118 Euro for the ferry, 70 Euro for petrol and and three hour drive there, three hour drive back and two hours on a boat plus say a tenner each (??) for tickets - total amount = 218 Euro)

The stuff I do download is usually stuff I would otherwise be exposed to being here..

Same with music, no Dutch radio station is going to play Maximo Park/Dogs Die In Hot Cars/the Futureheads so if I want to decide if the CD is worth buying internet so called 'pirates' are one of my only ways of getting a sample to listen to.

Then if I like it I buy it...

*Note to self - Must order those two films from Play when I have cash..

*I have an interview at Dell Computers on Tuesday, well paid possibly interesting job so if I got that I could afford it..

*Thanks to those who donated recently (you know who you are) it was appreciated greatly [Wink]

[ 19.05.2005, 09:34: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by Bamba (Member # 330) on :
 
What about the flipside of the argument? That by paying to watch/rent/buy a film you're effectively promising your money in exchange for something you'll enjoy, something that'll entertain you, so if you go and see a film that's utterly shite (let's take the first two Star Wars films for the sake of an example) shouldn't you be due a refund? The product wasn't fit for purpose, it didn't entertain and wasn't enjoyable. As soon as film makers start offering this kind of schemefor stealing not only your money but time out of your life I'll start giving a shit about piracy.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:

Is it down to some sense of supporting the underdog, and despising the successful?

[...]

I occasionally download pirated movies, music, etc.
But at least I can admit that it's wrong.

Surely the successful are there to be hated. It's their purpose in life.

This depends upon at what point we draw the line, doesn't it? I don't see any anyone mentioning that photocopying pages out of books is (presumably) also illegal. I would imagine that a lot of stuff that gets posted up here is technically in breach of some copyright law. But how wrong is that really?

I download pirated stuff daily, hourly, constantly. I'm doing it now. I end up deleting everything -- usually after not very much time. But that is largely just experimentation, seeing if I like things or if things are interesting. Some deconstructor/minimalist once wrote a piece of music called one note once. Yes, it is what it sounds like but nobody in their right mind would shell out money for it. I spend a certain fraction of my money on media but that fraction wouldn't change if I had a 24meg pipe at home or no internet at all. It would change if I had a fatter salery. There is wrong and wrong, right? If someone is more successful than you, you are allowed to hate them. If they are less successful than you, you are allowed to walk all over them.

[ 19.05.2005, 09:31: Message edited by: statist ]
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
*Thanks to those who donated recently (you know who you are) it was appreciated greatly [Wink]

It was my idea and I never got around to it last week. Tommorow for sure. I promise. Sorry everyone.
 
Posted by dang65 (Member # 102) on :
 
It's a weird thing really, but I'm involved in some quite serious music piracy at the moment. It's just an internet forum where people put together collections of everything ever released by people like Hendrix, Dylan, The Smiths, The Clash, The Stones, Aphex Twin... I dunno, just everyone really. I got a Fairport Convention one in the post this week which was 2 DVDs containing thousands of MP3s - all their official albums, live stuff, radio sessions, solo recordings... just way over the top. To buy that sort of product would cost hundreds of pounds if you ever tried to purchase it legally. I got it for the price of a couple of blank CDs and a stamp.

Thing is, all I'll do is dip into it occasionally, figure out which albums I really like and go and buy them on CD because they'll sound better, be more convenient and have the proper packaging too.

It's the ultimate try-before-you buy scheme really. It's not like I'm going to run off a load of copies and flog them down the market, and it's not like I'd ever have gone out and bought the stuff on spec anyway. But it's also not like the record company could ever put out a set like that themselves - for a start the product of a band like that would be spread across several different record companies.

So, this is really fans spreading the word among themselves. Someone offers me a selection of music by a band or artist I've only heard in passing, or I've got one of their albums but not sure if I want to buy more, and I take the offer. If I don't buy anything then there's no change to the existing situation, if I do buy something then the record company has made some cash they wouldn't have otherwise, from pressing up a copy of a record that was made 30 years ago or more.

With the music and film industries selling more product at the moment than they have ever done in the whole of history, it's a bit feeble of them to make such a fuss about a sort of viral marketing scheme which is doing more benefit to them than anything they've managed to come up with in over a century of trying. I realise they can't possibly endorse it, but they could stop the incessant whining.
 
Posted by Physic (Member # 195) on :
 
Darryn are you on speaking terms with the bank manager these days if I send you a cheque or do I need to sandwich some euros between bits of card and hope light-fingered posties don't realise? Oh and if there's anything else you want sending over at the same time drop me a mail or summat.
 
Posted by Physic (Member # 195) on :
 
I just spent £30 on DVDs and CDs from Play, does that make me a good little law abiding capitalist then?

I haven't actually dl'ed any films from the web since they started to really crack down on it and close sites tbh, one cease and desist letter is quite enough for me to be honest..
 
Posted by squeegy (Member # 136) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
something Good become something Bad through laziness and greed. And greed is something that is undeniably associated with Lucas, what with his unnecessary tinkering with re-releases.

Thats a bit unfair isn't it? Surely he is quite passionate about Star Wars too? Enough to direct the last 3 movies (remember, he didnt bother with Ep 5 and 6).

As for the re-releases, they came out when I was a teen. It meant I got to watch them in the cinema for the first time and enjoyed it quite a lot. I think its fair to say greed plays a big role in merchandising but dont forget people DO buy all that crap. They want to buy it.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by squeegy:
I think its fair to say greed plays a big role in merchandising but dont forget people DO buy all that crap. They want to buy it.

But Lucas was the first to realise its potential. I also think he deserves a bit of credit for plumming so much of his cash back into the industry (ILM, THX, etc). At least you feel like some of your cinema ticket / DVD money is going to be used for something that might affect the medium... (tenuous perhaps)
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
At least you feel like some of your cinema ticket / DVD money is going to be used for something that might affect the medium... (tenuous perhaps)

No, that's a fair point. Wookiesound Ltd spent a fuck loads helping develop 5.1. to make it an accesible medium to the industry.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
How about someone writing a review of this film.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
Okay, just seen it. Bound to be spoilers so you're warned.

There are problems, there are laughably bad moments, but there is also a sense of something grander just out of reach, just beyond Lucas' talent as a film maker, and it is here that the film works. What it does is drive home how little you care about Anakin Skywalker the character, and his journey. What it does is make you wish that the prequal trilogy had been nothing more but a long grand space opera, a war between the Jedi and the Sith, brewing to a point. You wish that Anakin hadn't been introduced, and that something so weak as bad dreams and pride makes him turn to the bad side. The problem is that the first film had a talented if annoying kid who did alright partly out of luck, partly out of the force (a la Luke) then the second jumped into teen angst mode, and you stopped pretending to care about how he turned because he was simply just a pouting little prick. Ewan McGregor spends the first part of the film delivering buffon lines, but soon gets more to do, and, like Clones, once he is off being a Jedi, it works better. Christopher Lee is wasted, the CGI is over used for people jumping around, but the general feel of the film is better. Opening with a huge space battle that slowly whittles down to one on one, Jedi on Sith, brother against brother battles, which again leaves you thinking, if the first two films had used this template, if they had just been about the Jedi losing its hold as glactic peace keepers, it would have worked better. Better than the other prequals, and very very dark, it's the best of a bad bunch.

The good; McGregor in the second half of the film. The lightsabre fights. The opening battle.

The bad; More condensing of the Star Wars universe until everyone knows everyone as Geroge tries to get as many OT references in as possible. Natalie Portman wasted.

The Ugly; Vader being born like a bumbling idiot, and being all humane asking about the missus (just didn't work). Samuel Jackson's Mace Windu must be the stupidest jedi ever, and his death isn't all that impressive.

And finally - what exactly are the Sith getting revenge for?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I believe the Sith are getting revenge for being out of power for 1000 years or so.

I've read a very interesting review written by a woman who hadn't seen any of the films, then watched them all in order last week: she points out some surprising holes and inconsistencies of tone and focus, most notably that someone in her position doesn't want to see Luke, Leia, Han and Chewbacca -- they want more of Darth Vader. Lucas' current line that the 6 episodes are all about the story of Anakin, and that this was always the idea, seems one of his thin ret-cons, like the claim that Luke and Leia were always meant to be twins. In fact, that Luke and Leia's relationship isn't revealed until late in the final episode seems pretty odd after watching Revenge of the Sith; Yoda and Obi-Wan both knew the situation, and it's hard to believe they both thought it was in Luke's interest not to be told.

However, the transition from Episodes III to IV worked very well for her, and it was one of the most satisfying elements for me too -- I don't really see how this could have been done better, and in fact the same is true for most of Revenge of the Sith. I'd been imagining and speculating scenes from this film since maybe 1980, and the majority of them are stunningly handled -- many of them are even surprising, which seems quite an achievement given that this is a film sandwiched between 5 other films I know intimately.

Anyway, thoughts off the top of my head but my feeling about Episode III is that I don't really care who bashes it, because they are either denying themselves something really good, satisfying, moving, epic and worth waiting for -- or that engagement with the film was simply not available to them because of their lack of investment in the saga as a whole. It does work as a film on its own, I think, but the real power is in the payoff of the whole shebang.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Benny the Ball:
that something so weak as bad dreams and pride makes him turn to the bad side.

This is nonsense. Anakin turns to the Dark Side mainly because of his all-consuming and I thought quite convincing love for Padme, his (pretty well-founded, given the accuracy of his visions) fears that she's going to die, and Palpatine's canny use of these weaknesses. I had no problem with this at all, and his turning was a lot more plausible and emotionally complex than I'd expected.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
I guess I just never got a sense of that love being all consuming as the 2nd film handled it in a cack-handed manner, and as I said Portman was wasted in this one. Everytime they are together in Sith it makes it look like one of the worst relationships ever "hey honey how you doing?" pouts "no one thinks that I'm as great as they keep saying I am" "oh, hold me".
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I agree that their scenes together were one of the weakest parts of this movie -- the whole exchange about "so love is blind, then" was awful, like a run-through by two embarrassed amateur actors who barely understood the lines. It should have been, and was perhaps aiming for, the teen-Shakespeare flirting of Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet (although these people are married and pregnant... do couples that established still behave like kids on a first date?) but I can't deny it was painful to watch.*

However, I think Anakin's obsession with Padme and overwhelming motivation not to lose her was punched home convincingly, more than once. Maybe it wasn't so much love as posession on his part, and a drive for control, and the determination not to let anything happen to Padme (and to his child) as it happened to his mother. He came across, quite well I thought, as a young man caught in the machinations of far older men, used as a pawn and treated with contempt by the people he wanted to respect. He was trying to dutifully control his power, knowing he was actually stronger than the Masters who scorned him -- he still parrots the Jedi Code and is obviously making the effort to stick to its guidance even when Palpatine is winning him over. Through all the pressures on him -- the confusions, the conflicting tensions, the duties as spy and counter-spy -- I felt it absolutely made sense when he, in the spur of the moment, shifted his position and blocked Mace Windu's execution stroke. One second before, he'd been insisting they had to spare Palpatine for trial -- and probably convincing himself that his motives were Jedi-pure -- the next second, he was acting on instinct and sparing Palpatine on selfish impulse, because Palpatine is the one person who promised he'd stop Padme's death. I felt this was really quite surprisingly complex, and though Christensen is not an actor of depth or sophistication, maybe he didn't need to be: he was almost a dummy, being manipulated by both sides until he snapped and attached himself to the one that offered him most comfort.

One of the film's triumphs, I feel, is the way it genuinely will transform the way we first respond to Vader on the Blockade Runner of A New Hope -- it will feel immediately familiar after the final scenes of Episode III, and Vader will still be a weak figure in some ways: betrayed, lied to, robbed of anything that meant anything to him, and unaware that he's launching his troops against his own two children, would have been his one source of joy and provided his one possibility of redemption. His armour and mask are more a prison than an enhancement.**
------------------------
* ETA I am reading through all RottenTomatoes reviews -- NB it gets 83%, though I'm sure "Ben" will find some fraudulent way to discredit such a figure, probably while mock-naively pretending the film is called "Teh Sith Come Back (Again)"

anyway here's a nice echo

quote:
Since Attack of the Clones, Hayden Christensen, especially, and Natalie Portman have honed their acting, but Lucas’ staging of their intimate moments comes across as wooden, as if they were the leads in a high school production of Romeo and Juliet.


----------------------------

** another review-segment I strongly agree with

quote:
what we gain from watching Revenge of the Sith is details. These events come to life and we are presented with the opportunity to understand the particulars of each event. The jigaw puzzle is complete. In the process, Vader has been humanized in a way that even the ending of Return of the Jedi was unable to accomplish. It will not be possible to watch the original trilogy in the same way again. Revenge of the Sith changes everything

...

Lucas makes the first appearance of the black mask and costume a moment of profound sadness. In that moment, we aren't so much experiencing the emergence of Vader as we are seeing the final death throes of Anakin. And, while there's an admitted thrill to hearing the voice of James Earl Jones, the content of some of Jones' lines is unlike anything we have previously heard from the voice-box of Vader. Not all eyes will be dry by the end of Revenge of the Sith. It has an emotional kick that no Star Wars film other than The Empire Strikes Back has achieved.


...

Revenge of the Sith starts out a little unfocused. While there's plenty of action in the first hour, the direction of the storyline is uncertain. By the time the film has reached its halfway point, however, and Anakin's moral compass has been shattered, the picture picks up a momentum that never flags.



[ 19.05.2005, 19:51: Message edited by: kovacs ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Anyway, another of my overriding feelings after this film was how much I wish The Phantom Menace could be redone. Episode II really wasn't bad, but the first prequel barely has any salvageable scenes. A real problem in terms of the saga as a whole, that Lucas seems to have rediscovered his game now but that the opening chapter is by far the worst.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
I agree with that. The one aspect of the prequels I really liked was the sense that the polical conspiracy, although seemingly flimsy, actually worked quite well. The manner in which Palpatine made sure that the clone troops were on as many planets as possible, and made sure that the Jedi's guard was down (with only Yoda seemingly aware of something coming and seemingly accepting it as a Jedi, as not holding onto the present) when he struck was well played in this film. Yoda worked well in this film overall I felt, you got a sense of his power, particularly when he entered Palpatine's office and desposed of his guards with a wave of his arm as though they were nothing.
The only things worthwhile from the first film though are a couple of moments from the opening that establish that the Jedi are at their prme and the face off between Qui Gon, Obi Wan and Darth Maul - which makes me feel that the films would have worked better if we had met Anaking when he was 'a great pilot' and not known as much about his past.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
I don't really care who bashes it, because they are either denying themselves something really good, satisfying, moving, epic and worth waiting for -- or that engagement with the film was simply not available to them because of their lack of investment in the saga as a whole.

So - "all bases covered". As usual, if you don't enjoy the new Star Wars film it's your own god-damned fault.

 -
DELETED SCENE: Bounty hunter Gnowles-i-Vacs disembarks at Mos Eisley spaceport.
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
It will not be possible to watch the original trilogy in the same way again. Revenge of the Sith changes everything

I'm interested that you enjoyed it kovacs, but this sentiment disturbs me slightly. I'm not sure if I want the original trilogy changed. I like Vader in IV and V. I like the mystery about his past and that exactly why he turned EVIL is not fully explained (can such changes ever be totally clear?). This has put me off seeing Revenge of the Sith more than the thought of clunky lines and acting. Do you know of any purists who refused to see any of the prequels?

[ 20.05.2005, 04:04: Message edited by: Vogon Poetess ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Benny the Ball:
I agree with that. The one aspect of the prequels I really liked was the sense that the polical conspiracy, although seemingly flimsy, actually worked quite well. The manner in which Palpatine made sure that the clone troops were on as many planets as possible, and made sure that the Jedi's guard was down (with only Yoda seemingly aware of something coming and seemingly accepting it as a Jedi, as not holding onto the present) when he struck was well played in this film.

I saw a quite intelligent review yesterday that pointed out the parallels between this sequence and the end of The Godfather -- which as Lucas was pals with Coppola, actually makes as much sense as my idea that Lucas was borrowing from Godard. (That's "a lot of sense".) Very interesting the way this film broke away from the usual patterns of narration and scope in Star Wars. Episode IV is very linear and simple by comparision, and marks a return to basics -- refreshingly so, perhaps, after the rich, dark climax to Episode III -- but in no other film, as I remember it, do we see someone's dream sequences (they're just described) or shoot off across the galaxy to five places within ten minutes, to witness characters' fates. It's as though we cut to Alderaan before the destruction of the planet in Episode IV -- and who knows, perhaps that scene's coming in a full-saga DVD reworking. There, it would probably seem intrusive as it goes against that Episode IV simplicity and naivety. Here, the sequence works really powerfully: but the idea of us being privileged observers of stuff the main characters don't see, only hear about, is entirely new.

quote:

Yoda worked well in this film overall I felt, you got a sense of his power, particularly when he entered Palpatine's office and desposed of his guards with a wave of his arm as though they were nothing.



Got the only laugh in my cinema, though it was a good group feeling and based on relief I think, following the grim preceding scenes.

quote:

The only things worthwhile from the first film though are a couple of moments from the opening that establish that the Jedi are at their prme and the face off between Qui Gon, Obi Wan and Darth Maul - which makes me feel that the films would have worked better if we had met Anakin when he was 'a great pilot' and not known as much about his past.

Yeah, I think we could definitely have met Anakin later. It perhaps adds something that we've seen him as an innocent, victimised little mite, and we do have to see his mother in Episode I for Episode II to work. I wonder how it could have been done better, though of course those thoughts just lead to frustration... to anger! If Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan had met him age 12, he'd still be potentially annoying. NB though he was a "great pilot" in Episode I, plausibly or not.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
So - "all bases covered". As usual, if you don't enjoy the new Star Wars film it's your own god-damned fault.

If you refuse to see the film, how can you possibly know if you'd have enjoyed it or not?

Surely there's not much point in continuing to bash RotS and poke fun at those who sing its praises when others have seen it, and you have no basis for your argument.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
So - "all bases covered". As usual, if you don't enjoy the new Star Wars film it's your own god-damned fault.



I see what you mean, but that's not my usual stance at all. If you search for my name on TheForce.net, as I'm sure you do regularly, you will mainly find "Brookner is a whining basher, why did he bother writing 100,000 words sayng SW sucks.... Brooks sucks and if he posted on a moderated message bord I would rip each of his arguements to threads."

What I meant was that I am contented and personally fulfilled by my own satisfaction in Episode III -- I feel it closed the circle of my SW experience and honoured my memories of the first films. And that I didn't see the point in arguing with anyone who disagreed, because literally they got less than me: perhaps, as I said, because they don't have that investment.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
I'm interested that you enjoyed it kovacs, but this sentiment disturbs me slightly. I'm not sure if I want the original trilogy changed. I like Vader in IV and V. I like the mystery about his past and that exactly why he turned EVIL is not fully explained (can such changes ever be totally clear?). This has put me off seeing Revenge of the Sith more than the thought of clunky lines and acting. Do you know of any purists who refused to see any of the prequels?

I don't really mix with SW fans anymore and was remarkably spoiler-free yesterday -- even more than Modge and my Mother! I barely knew any details about what to expect, having avoided all reviews and articles.

It can't be denied that Episode III does have the effect you're wary of. I suppose you could still watch Episodes IV-VI in a distinct mindset, seeing them as a separate trilogy and wilfully forgetting what the first three films told you, but it might require some effort. In that sense Lucas has changed the first three films without even touching them, and I can see that might be a problem for some -- he has made Episode IV richer in a way, but also shifted the focus so, as I mentioned, some people might be wondering why there's so little about Vader and so much about these young idiots we just met.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
If you refuse to see the film, how can you possibly know if you'd have enjoyed it or not?

Surely there's not much point in continuing to bash RotS and poke fun at those who sing its praises when others have seen it, and you have no basis for your argument.

On the other hand, if I go to see it and it's shit (very likely, on the evidence of the two preceding films) then Lucas has 'won'. There's no way I can claim that money back and, so far as Lucas is concerned, I'm a faithful consumer who paid to see all three films.

It's telling that, for all its mythic status (not to mention colossal box office/spin-off receipts) fans are so touchy about the franchise that they want to foreclose or preempt any critcism at all of this thing into which they've invested so heavily.

So far as I can see, even the positive reviews/comments about the film are a repeat of the mish-mash of relief, self-deception and special pleading that accompanied Attack of the Clones - and what a lot of shite that turned out to be.

No, fuck it. I'm not joining the rest of the livestock who found the first two films disappointing but will still hand over good money to "see if it's any better".

After all, not seeing The Matrix Revolutions hasn't done me any harm.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
*twitch-twitch*
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
if I go to see it and it's shit (very likely, on the evidence of the two preceding films) then Lucas has 'won'. There's no way I can claim that money back and, so far as Lucas is concerned, I'm a faithful consumer who paid to see all three films.

It's telling that, for all its mythic status (not to mention colossal box office/spin-off receipts) fans are so touchy about the franchise that they want to foreclose or preempt any critcism at all of this thing into which they've invested so heavily.

No, fuck it. I'm not joining the rest of the livestock who found the first two films disappointing but will still hand over good money to "see if it's any better".


I don't know why you're deliberately ignoring everything I said, and that you probably already knew, about my very vocal disappointment with Episode I and my mixed feelings about Episode II. You cannot pretend I'm a blinkered fanboy who loves everything Lucas has produced and will swear blind this is a great movie just to pay off my own investment.

And it's baffling that to you, that "investment" seems to be so blatantly financial... you're resentful of Lucas because he might take £5 off you (probably 2/6' in Harrogate) and give you two and a half hours of imperfect entertainment. I paid £7.50 last night for a vodka lemonade and a bottle of Corona. They were gone in 20 minutes. I don't think paying less than that for Revenge of the Sith is really something to complain about. How tight are you that you're unwilling to hand over some piddling amount, imagining Lucas counting your pennies and feeling he's "won"?

Anyway Ben, look at what you're missing.

quote:
Darth-Notorious
Registered: Jan 04

Date Posted: 5/19 2:11am Subject: Did anybody else Cry?
Yo I starting crying like a little girl around the last fight....which sucks cause Im like the bigest dude on the football team....shhhh dont say a word.

I mean really crying yo....like if somebody close to me died....than when ANIE lit up....OMG....I did that sucky Air, cant breath thingy.......My girl LOL at me.....

did anybody else feel the same way?


-----signature-----
The Bronx Most Notorious.......
315pounds of BEEFCAKE!! BEEFCAKE!!!
The Football Geek



DeusAnimus313
Registered: May 05

Date Posted: 5/19 2:12am Subject: RE: Did anybody else Cry?
i started tearing up when mace pwned palps...omg i love this movie. i was in tears during the duel, so frickin emotional man, only movie i have ever cried in


 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
If you refuse to see the film, how can you possibly know if you'd have enjoyed it or not?

Surely there's not much point in continuing to bash RotS and poke fun at those who sing its praises when others have seen it, and you have no basis for your argument.

On the other hand, if I go to see it and it's shit (very likely, on the evidence of the two preceding films) then Lucas has 'won'. There's no way I can claim that money back and, so far as Lucas is concerned, I'm a faithful consumer who paid to see all three films.
I'm not saying you have to see the film! Nobody is forcing you to! *grone*

I just don't understand know how you can hope to argue about the merits of a film you haven't seen. You come across as a mindless basher with nothing to back up your views, except for "the others prequels were lame and so Sith must be, too"

Search your feelings, ben.
You know you're better than this.

[ 20.05.2005, 05:02: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
But Misc, you disappoint me too with your one-line review. You're the one who's been keeping the faith for months.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
But Misc, you disappoint me too with your one-line review. You're the one who's been keeping the faith for months.

I'm too busy at the moment.
Besides, you seem to have it covered for now.

A quick question for those who have seen all the Star Wars films: How would you rank them?

LatePoster LaterFist:

2=: tESB
2=: RotS
3: aNH
4: AotC
5: RotJ
6: tPM

[ 20.05.2005, 08:30: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by Sleeper Service (Member # 314) on :
 
SPOILERS

On the whole my stance lies halfway between BtB and Kovacs, so I won't attempt to re-hash a lot of what they have said in my own attempt at a full review.

Thoughts:

There were some truly cringeworthy scenes/dialogue/acting, and I think these stuck out more sharply than in the previous prequels because Sith got so much other stuff right.

Ian McDearmid [sp?] stole the show in my opinion. His drifting from "Helpless but benign" to "wheedling and manipulative" into "Dark and powerful Sith lord" often through the course of a single monologue or line was superb. I can't decide whether his lines alone in the film were written by someone else or whether he just managed to work better with what he was given than the rest of the cast. I found him convincing and entertaining throughout.

It may seem churlish, but I found some of the epic scenes involving layer upon layer of CGI too detailed. Time and time again I found myself confused and distracted by the wealth of action occurring in the background of a scene and my focus drifted.

My favourite "epic" battle scene was the (woefully short and underused) fight on Kashyyk[sp?] I though that looked great and showed real promise, but was cut away from and over all too soon.

Finally:

What kind of time scale was the movie supposed to occur over? It seemed to me (and I may have missed something) that the events took place in no more than a month - perhaps a few weeks, yet Padame went from not long pregnant to fully gravid in this time.....

Perhaps it was those crazy Midichlorians.....

[ 20.05.2005, 08:55: Message edited by: Sleeper Service ]
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
Warning – contains spoilers (or lies):


His midiclorions may be off the scale but young Anakin Skyscraper is as dumb as a butt.

So there’s been a clone war but not much time seems to have passed (could be anything from 3 months to maybe a year).

Anakin is still no more than a stroppy teenager with a hardon for Padme. It’s not a true love that they share, more a sort of pathetic togetherness, like a couple of Chav teenagers with all the passion of a cold teabag and a bottle of Diamond White. Of course they’ve gone and gotten married (for the Lucas family circus of values sake I expect) and now randy little Ann’s gone and got her in the family way too, I suppose he had to really otherwise there’d be no need to make Episode IV and to be honest that’s the only film that makes this whole sorry saga worth making.

Right so then what happens ?

There’s some nonsense about Chancellor Palpating having been kidnapped by some robots, Vincent Price and General Groovyarse which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that contrary to popular belief Jedi’s are incredibly stupid and have no empathic ability whatsoever so when they stumble in to rescue Chimpanzee Platypus and he’s sitting there all cool as a cucumber and sarcastic they don’t automatically think “hang on this is a bit sus” instead they showboat about waggling lightsabres till Oddie Wank Enobi gets knocked out and crushed by a balcony or a boat or something and Anadin cuts off Vincent Prices hands (There’s a lot of hand loss in Star Wars films don’t you think ?) and then at Chilly Willy’s request lops his head off for good measure.. NO CLUE THAT PAMPLEMOUSE MIGHT BE EVIL THERE THEN MR ASPIRIN ??

Rescue Otto Jan from under the boat/caravan/thing crushing him and off..

Wherever it was they went, Adenoid meets up with Paddle and she tells him she’s well up the junction, he seems unbothered, hungry and tired.
She talks; oh boy does she talk, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah… She drones on and on at him for about 20 minutes, no wonder he’s going to the Dark Side I’d do it just to shut her up.
She finally bores him into a coma like sleep where, he dreams she dies in childbirth and who can blame him after what seemed like forever listening to her yap on) he feels bad about this (I suspect because really he secretly enjoyed the idea) and gets a fret on which can be easily exploited later on by Casanova Frankenstein.

Then there’s some plot about the robots and General Nastiness and Ol’ Dirty Bastard is dispatched off to kill him/it/her/whatever the shower headed robot lizard thing is which he does whilst riding a giant newt with a feather hat – WHY ? Who knows..

Meanwhile the Jedi have all split up and buggered off to different planets with a troop of Storm troopers each to look for flowers/discover America/fall off the edge of the universe/get some Rizlas from the all night garage or something, it doesn’t really matter what just as long as later on they’re all spit up..

Meanwhile Antefix is still having bad dreams, he’s also been elbowed onto the Jedi board of directors by Churchill Insurance who wants a man in the camp to tell him what’s going on, oh and of course they’re not going to make Annie a Jedi Master now he’s on the council as they think he’s a bit dim. This pisses him off. (About now he starts to remind me of Cartman and I spend the rest of the movie doing the Cartman voice over whatever he says in my head) “By the way” they add “You can spy on Pimplecream for us y’know off the record like” so he does.

Then, much like George Lucas I don’t know what happened. There was a bit about the Jedi wanting to take over spouted by Panorama which Luke bought hook line and sinker, some rubbish about how a great sith Lord called Darth Merenghi finally figured out how to control Midichlorides to stop people dying/live forever/get out stains or something which Pantyhose says Han can use to save his Missus from dying.
Then the ‘Bad Mother Fucker Jedi’ Window comes to kill the Chancellor who goes all manky and fat with wrinkles and bad teeth during the fight to add menace to the rest of the film.
Ani helps Palpie beat Window and Bobs your Uncle boy he’s a baddie and suddenly Called Darth Vader. Then he goes and kills some Jedi babies to make the deal official while Pandaeyes calls his Stromtroopers and gets them to execute top secret plan kill all the Jedi.

There are some Wookies (And yes, one is Chewbacca how he ends up working for Harry Potter in episode 4 is a mystery) , Yoda and a tiny, tiny spaceship.

So I think everyone Jedi wise is dead now apart from Ani, Obi and Yodi and Ani don’t count as he’s bought some yellow contacts.

Then a fight with Yoda vs. Pitbull (Yoda loses and runs away to hide in a swamp)

Then it’s the big fight with Odelay and Ann. Oldie and Paddle go to find Anne who’s been off killing the fish things from episode one in a hollowed out volcano lair. Podule pleads with Anne to be a good boy, he strops and chokes her with his force fingers and then it’s down to business.

Swish swash, buzz, clung, swish swash, jump, bounce, jump, and swish, no legs, on fire stumpy and bald. Obi wins and the crowd goes wild but rather than nip down and stab torso boy in the brain with a light sword he just buggers off to help Patsy have her babies (yes twins, what a surprise) and die in childbirth..

Meanwhile Darth’s not dead OH NO HE ISN’T ! He’s just burned, badly. Oh and legless. The Chancellor locates him using the signal from his mobile phone and takes him off to a spaceship with a MEDIBOT in it who gives the stump some robot legs and a hat with a voice changer so he sounds like James Earl Jones..

Darth asks how his missus is and is told he killed her which leads to the worst moment in the movie the cry of “NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO” I laughed so hard I did a wee.

Then there are shots of Darth and Pallatine looking at a bit of the Death Star and the babies being split up..

THE END.

What bugged me was the Death Star.. In A New Hope the Death Star is ‘almost’ finished meaning it’s taken like 20 years to build – The same amount of time its taken Luke and Lulu to grow up..

In Return of the Jedi they’ve speed built another replacement Death Star but in just a fraction of the time..


Oh and why was there a giant goldfish bowl full of mermaids in the middle of the senate when Pangolin was talking to Antacid about being a baddie ?

My ranking: Pretty but tosh 3/10

[ 20.05.2005, 08:55: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
What is Sith? Is it a race? A religion? A disease? How do people turn into one? And do they have to be scary-looking for it to happen? Was Dooku a sith?

EDIT: To lol at D.

[ 20.05.2005, 08:56: Message edited by: Black Mask ]
 
Posted by Sleeper Service (Member # 314) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:


In Return of the Jedi they’ve speed built another replacement Death Star but in just a fraction of the time..

Different contractors?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sleeper Service:
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:


In Return of the Jedi they’ve speed built another replacement Death Star but in just a fraction of the time..

Different contractors?
Death Star Canteen ?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sleeper Service:
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:


In Return of the Jedi they’ve speed built another replacement Death Star but in just a fraction of the time..

Different contractors?
Maybe they used the broken one for spares?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
Nah, it was proper blowed up and everything there wouldn't have been any spares

[ 20.05.2005, 09:05: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
If the 'donut' theory of space is correct all the exploded bits would keep moving outwards from the epicentre of the Death Star explosion through frictionless space until they arrived back at exactly the same spot with sufficient energy to recombine themselves. Bingo!
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
The Sith are, I think, just an order like the Jedi -- being or becoming one falls somewhere between religious faith and military/political allegiance.

As TMO was down for some time, I decided to fill that space by going to see Revenge of the Sith again! So I'm off for double the pleasure.

I agree with many of Sleeper Service's comments, by the way -- the frames were too crowded, and this has been a problem with Lucas' aesthetic since the Special Editions. He doesn't seem to be looking at it as cinema -- he and his minions are getting off on what they can see frame by frame on their monitors, forgetting that an audience watches 24 of those frames per second.

And Palpatine really was classy, oily acting... some fantastic little twitches and slithers, especially in the unprecedented scene where he sits down in a theatre to tell the story of Darth Plagus (sp, I am not geek enough to know this one).

Anyone who laughs at or scorns Vader's anguished cry, and there are many such people, has simply not bought into the character emotionally. If you engage with everything Anakin's gone through, I don't see why it's ludicrous. He did all that to save his wife, and now this fucker lies to him and says she's dead by his own hand. In Vader's final scene (with that uncannily convincing, but pleasingly subtle Tarkin cameo) I felt a sense of total resignation and deadness -- he has nothing else to live for so he's falling heavily into the patterns of his duty to the Emperor.

By the way, where was Mon Mothma. I didn't spot her, which again, to me, is a good sign in terms of Lucas supposedly ramming Original Trilogy cameos knowingly in our faces.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
If the 'donut' theory of space is correct

Recent high-redshift supernova observations indicate an open universe, though (Ruiz-Lapuente & Canal, 1998). This wouldn't occur in an open universe. The only feasible mechanism I can see is self-recollapse under its own self gravity. This would indicate the bomb dropped in the little hole by Luke at the end of episode 4 dissipated less energy than the gravitational binding energy of the original death star.
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
Did you ever read The Science of Star Trek, Statist?
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poetess:
Did you ever read The Science of Star Trek, Statist?

Indeed I did not. I fucking hate Star Trek. What I wrote, while somewhat unlikely and yes, maybe even a little nerdy, isn't fiction. There's a genuine citation in my post. Ruiz-Lapuente will be thrilled I'm sure.

[ 20.05.2005, 09:19: Message edited by: statist ]
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
siens

Huh, waddayaknow. I just made the donut-thing up. Could the absence of a Death Star have gravity?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
The Anakin character is a shit character that is almost impossible to connect with which is why these three prequels are in many ways just rubbish.

It's just him that spoils the films for me, I'd have been happier if Jar Jar had gone on to become Darth Vader

[ 20.05.2005, 09:22: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Could the absence of a Death Star have gravity?

Well, yes. It may not be a death star any more but the bits are still there. The particles haven't been destroyed, just repositioned slightly.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
just repositioned slightly.

You mean 'slightly' as in 'all over the universe'?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
 -
Anakin, pondering the future.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
 -
Anakin, consumed with hate.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
 -
Anakin, a tender moment.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
siens

Huh, waddayaknow. I just made the donut-thing up. Could the absence of a Death Star have gravity?
Well in theory all of the component parts of the Death Star would have their own gravitational attraction, although very weak. Within certain distances, and assuming there are no other factors (like, uh, a huge planet sized thermonuclear explosion for instance) then with enough time this might be enough to attract the bits back together again. This wouldn't actually happen though, hence why we have asteroid belts and stuff, whcih are made of pretty big bits of rock which bounce off each other and yet don't form into some kind of solid block. This means that the kinetic energy of a moving body is much greater than the gravitational potential energy it generates.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
You mean 'slightly' as in 'all over the universe'?

Well, that depends. If the energy of the initial explosion was enough to give each particle a velocity greater than the original escape velocity in the centre of mass reference frame, then yes. Else, self attrcation will eventially slow the bits down and they will fall back together. Whether or not they fall into exactly the same positions and recreate the death star is another matter. The odds are small but non-zero.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
 -
Anakin, at the point of orgasm.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ringo:
Well in theory all of the component parts of the Death Star would have their own gravitational attraction, although very weak. Within certain distances, and assuming there are no other factors (like, uh, a huge planet sized thermonuclear explosion for instance) then with enough time this might be enough to attract the bits back together again. This wouldn't actually happen though, hence why we have asteroid belts and stuff, whcih are made of pretty big bits of rock which bounce off each other and yet don't form into some kind of solid block. This means that the kinetic energy of a moving body is much greater than the gravitational potential energy it generates.

Nobody's impressed, science-boy.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
 -
Anakin, at the shops.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
FOAD newb
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
You mean 'slightly' as in 'all over the universe'?

Well, that depends. If the energy of the initial explosion was enough to give each particle a velocity greater than the original escape velocity in the centre of mass reference frame, then yes. Else, self attrcation will eventially slow the bits down and they will fall back together. Whether or not they fall into exactly the same positions and recreate the death star is another matter. The odds are small but non-zero.
god i love scientists.

er.

carry on.


in other news
"younglings"
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
Anakins last shout at Kenobi "I hate you" did sound almost as though it had been lifeted directly from a Harry Enfield sketch and I was expecting it to be followed by a "it's just so unfair"
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
The odds are small but non-zero.

I'm going to be saying this a lot in the future.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ringo:
FOAD newb

Thanks, man. But I think, at least to some degree, you deserved that.

[ 20.05.2005, 09:33: Message edited by: statist ]
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
 -
"I didn't ask to be born!"
 
Posted by discodamage (Member # 66) on :
 
yeah yeah younglings faux-archaic but i think i read a quote in elizabeth's london: everday life in elizabethan london; liza picard, orion, 2004 which uses the word. unfortunately it is in my living room in london so i cant check, but i think youngling is authentic to the 16th century.
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
I don't know why you're deliberately ignoring everything I said, and that you probably already knew, about my very vocal disappointment with Episode I and my mixed feelings about Episode II. You cannot pretend I'm a blinkered fanboy who loves everything Lucas has produced and will swear blind this is a great movie just to pay off my own investment.

I'm not ignoring you, Kovacs - I had to go to a meeting. [Frown]

While I wouldn't say you're a SW gusher, the early reference to 'investment' being a determinant of whether or not someone's likely to enjoy the film (hang plot, character, action, dialogue etc) set alarm bells ringing.

Your dismissal of "bashers" on account of them being either poseurs ('denying' themselves something worthwhile) or somehow incapable ('lack [of] investment') of properly appreciating the film strikes me as the reflex of a believer facing down a challenge to his beliefs, not a critical position that's open to debate.


quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
And it's baffling that to you, that "investment" seems to be so blatantly financial... you're resentful of Lucas because he might take £5 off you (probably 2/6' in Harrogate) and give you two and a half hours of imperfect entertainment. I paid £7.50 last night for a vodka lemonade and a bottle of Corona. They were gone in 20 minutes. I don't think paying less than that for Revenge of the Sith is really something to complain about. How tight are you that you're unwilling to hand over some piddling amount, imagining Lucas counting your pennies and feeling he's "won"?.

Here's a thing. People get passionate about film - when Thorn wrote his splendid rant about Van Helsing or when you spoofed Matrix Revolutions each of you gained force and momentum from the fact that you felt personally insulted by the films you'd watched. The fact that you'd paid £7 or whatever for the privilege just added salt to the wound.

It isn't the money that would bother me so much as the fact that once again I'd been fooled/hyped/swindled into watching something that I ought to have guessed was going to be rotten. I felt doubly annoyed after I'd seen AOTC because a) The sheer awfulness of TPM should have warned me to steer clear and b) I'd been fooled into going by nothing more convincing than a poster of Christopher Lee wielding a light sabre and lots of people cooing about how it was "nearly as good as Empire."

I emerged from that viewing with the feeling that I'd been tricked - but by whom? George Lucas and his supporters, that's who.

I am willing to bet an earlobe on the collective hard-on for Sith wilting just as surely as the one for Clones did. I give it either six months or until the 'full saga' box set appears.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
Thanks, man. But I think, at least to some degree, you deserved that.

I don't have to say "I was only joking with you" do I? Because I hate having to say that, it makes me sound like such a cock jockey. You wouldn't want that. Would you?

Anyway, enough of this offtopic talk.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
 -
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
Anyone who laughs at or scorns Vader's anguished cry, and there are many such people, has simply not bought into the character emotionally.

It is the actor's task to convince rather than the audience's duty to 'buy in'.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
mind you it must be hard to act in that hat.. had he been told on the operating table I might have bought it, but JEJ voice sounding petulant just could not wash

[ 20.05.2005, 09:42: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
And those scars look nasty. He wants to let the air get at those.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
r2-d2 and his comedy oil spurting
younglings
hayden plank
temeura morrison

an over reliance on "homage" to the following three episodes (re shots that are re done, lines that are reused).

an audience that clapped and cheered as the titles started. no clapping and cheering throughout. at the end people (5) clapping. everyone else looking like "well i hoped he wouldn't shit all over my head while fucking my mum in front of me. and he didn't. he just shat on me."

worst star wars ever.

also the last "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" looked like hugh laurie in blackadder III pretending to be an actor.

[ 20.05.2005, 09:45: Message edited by: doc d ]
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
 -

Hellraiser VI: NWoD teh Cenobite
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" looked like hugh laurie in blackadder III pretending to be an actor.

Maybe he was showing us his "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" face?
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ringo:
You wouldn't want that. Would you?

No. Sorry.
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
Hellraiser VI: NWoD teh Cenobite

Lol. Harsh but true.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" looked like hugh laurie in blackadder III pretending to be an actor.

Maybe he was showing us his "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" face?
4/10.
could do better.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
and i was told wookiees.
lots of them.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
The biggest problem for me with the prequels is that the OT set up the Jedi to be something amazing, but we couldn't see that too much, as it was about their downfall. Apart from the line of emotional Jedi (Yoda, Qui Gon, Obi Wan, Anakin) and the Sith they all seemed pretty clueless and austere, and a little deserving of their collapse. That and the fact that Hayden seemed limited in what he had to work with. His bad dreams and moodiness didn't resonate enough for me, but his collapse as he acted out of instinct to save Palpatine did, as did his pissy-ness at seeing Obi Wan on Padme's ship. As for preferences;

1. ESB
2. ANH
3. RoTS
4. RoTJ
5= TPM
5= AoTC
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
A huge amount of this film ended up on the cutting room floor. The following scenes/events were dramatically reduced in length:

...and these scenes were removed entirely:

I guess Lucas wanted to keep it under 2½ hours. I'm sure he'll put some of it back in for the Ultimate Edition DVD Saga Boxset...
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
so is he going to release the original never been fucked with iv-vi again?
because, i'd pop a chubby over that.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
I don't think they exist any more.

In fact, look forward to seeing the original 3 films toyed with even more in the forthcoming box set, to the point that every scene is akin to flicking through a Where's Wally? picture book while someone stands behind you making lightsabre and wookie noises in your ear
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ringo:
I don't think they exist any more.

That's true, or so Lucas claims.

Funnily enough, I just saw the original VHS boxset (pre Special Edition) in Oxfam for £19.99.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
piss flaps.
there's a guy i work with who has them on video. but dvd just won't happen will it?


i know ultimately these are kids films, made for kids. but there's no fun in them. its films made for kids with aspergers.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:

its films made for kids with aspergers.

It's gonna get worse. In the next DVD edition Han buys Greedo a few drinks at the cantina and they talk over their differences. Greedo realises what an ultimately self-destructive act shooting Solo would be and he gives him a friendship bracelet.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
Is that the scene where the Jowas do a musical number, with the sand people doing cartwheels in the background?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
And Jabba the Hutt sings 'Akuna Matata'?

Yeah.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
i think there were custard pies and these guys make a special appearance
 -
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
i think there were custard pies and these guys make a special appearance
 -

Boba and Jango, unmasked.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
"He doesn't like you. I don't like you..."

"I'm sorry"

"It's alright, it's not your fault"

"Well.. seeya"

"say, isn't that Jedi Master Yoda's estranged father over in the corner playing space poker with Boba Fett and the ghost of Qui Gon Jinn?"

"woah you're right. Hey Obi-Wan, check this out"

"huh.... Luke, I am your mother..."

"!"
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
maybe we're experiencing what it was like when homer wroted and performed his stuff.
i bet he was constantly chopping and changing and "re-editing".
 
Posted by Roy (Member # 705) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by doc d:
maybe we're experiencing what it was like when homer wroted and performed his stuff.
i bet he was constantly chopping and changing and "re-editing".

Like, duh, Homer's films suck too. Haven't you seen Troy ?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
While I wouldn't say you're a SW gusher, the early reference to 'investment' being a determinant of whether or not someone's likely to enjoy the film (hang plot, character, action, dialogue etc) set alarm bells ringing.

Your dismissal of "bashers" on account of them being either poseurs ('denying' themselves something worthwhile) or somehow incapable ('lack [of] investment') of properly appreciating the film strikes me as the reflex of a believer facing down a challenge to his beliefs, not a critical position that's open to debate.


It is the actor's task to convince rather than the audience's duty to 'buy in'.




I actually agree with you. I would find it hard to judge RotS as a film in isolation, and I don't know whether it would really work as such, at all. I guess it would have exciting but meaningless sequences interrupted by baffling exchanges about quasi-science, cod-philosophy and daytime-soap romance.

But the film becomes meaningful in its context. Things I took pleasure in, such as the gradual and I feel very natural introduction of 1970s-SF basic aesthetic in stripped white spaceship interiors, Atari-style computer displays, nylon grey uniform and bowl haircuts, would have no resonance at all with a non- or anti-fan. Performances I relished, like Palpatine selling the Dark Side stealthily to a confused, vulnerable Anakin as "the whole story", not the evil alternative -- and Obi-Wan yelling with a mixture of sweaty exhaustion, grief and frustration that Anakin wasn't meant to do this, he was meant to solve the problems -- would just seem hokey and boring to someone who doesn't care about the saga.

So apart from the effects and I suppose the action, I can't see how this film would work for someone who isn't, to some extent, a "believer" -- who doesn't have some emotional investment in the original series at least.

Yes, it does come down to faith or lack of it. That's a dubious criterion for judging good cinema, I know, and I would be persuaded that RotS isn't "good cinema" really. But maybe not much Star Wars is good cinema in that standalone sense. It's a totally exceptional case in popular culture. I suggest it really does come down to emotional importance, and what it meant to you as a kid.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Anyway, some geeky questions and objections from my 2nd viewing that I haven't seen asked or answered elsewhere.

-- Yoda and Kenobi propose they're going to hide until the time is right. But in Episodes IV and V, they're discovered by Luke; they don't bide their time then reappear when they're needed again, they're called out of retirement by external circumstances.

-- the droids are given over to Captain Antilles on a blockade runner. (Presumably not called a Rebel blockade runner at this point.) 18 years later, the droids still seem to be on that same blockade runner, owned by Captain Antilles. Have their existences, and his, really been so boring and limited for almost 2 decades? No wonder Artoo embraces his mission.

-- for ages, folk including me have been referring to the cinnamon-rolls hairstyle as "Alderaanian ceremonial buns," explaining the ugly 'do as a ritual or social convention from that culture. Now, apparently, it turns out this is a hairstyle from Coruscant, and that Leia for some reason is wearing her hair as her mum did 20 years before.

-- did I miss something or how did nobody realise Padme was pregnant, for months?

-- ditto, how did nobody realise Anakin was the father/married to her? Isn't he meant to live in spartan Jedi quarters, not in her luxury skyscraper? How does Kenobi work with Anakin and not Force-feel anything of this, not detect for a moment that his supposedly celibate partner is married with a pregnant wife?

-- this is probably asked on TF.N every minute but not only does Ben K look much older in Episode IV; Beru seems about 18 at the end of Episode III, and about 60 when Luke's 18.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:

-- this is probably asked on TF.N every minute but not only does Ben K look much older in Episode IV; Beru seems about 18 at the end of Episode III, and about 60 when Luke's 18.

That's an easy one Kovacs, too much sun ages you really badly. She may look 60 but is in fact just 40.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
-- Yoda and Kenobi propose they're going to hide until the time is right. But in Episodes IV and V, they're discovered by Luke; they don't bide their time then reappear when they're needed again, they're called out of retirement by external circumstances.

Is Obi-Wan Kenobi 'discovered' by Luke? As I remember it, Obi-Wan happened across Luke in a crumpled state on the rocks after he'd been attacked by a Tusken Raider. I imagine Kenobi sensed Luke's arrival on his doorstep, with an important message from his sister, as the Will of the Force and hence decided to reveal the truth to the boy.

And Yoda definitely isn't 'discovered' by Luke. The force-ghost of Obi-Wan Kenobi appeared to Luke on Hoth and said something along the lines of:

quote:
BEN: Luke...Luke.

LUKE: (weakly) Ben?

BEN: You will go to the Dagobah system.

LUKE: Dagobah system?

BEN: There you will learn from Yoda, the Jedi Master who instructed me.

quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
-- the droids are given over to Captain Antilles on a blockade runner. (Presumably not called a Rebel blockade runner at this point.) 18 years later, the droids still seem to be on that same blockade runner, owned by Captain Antilles. Have their existences, and his, really been so boring and limited for almost 2 decades? No wonder Artoo embraces his mission.

They've gone from being in the service of Jedi - people who surely live rather extraordinary lives in the GFFA - to the service of Captain Antilles who could have had very different role in mind for them - as the tools they were created to be.

quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
-- for ages, folk including me have been referring to the cinnamon-rolls hairstyle as "Alderaanian ceremonial buns," explaining the ugly 'do as a ritual or social convention from that culture. Now, apparently, it turns out this is a hairstyle from Coruscant, and that Leia for some reason is wearing her hair as her mum did 20 years before.

That term was never more than EU (if indeed that), but if it bothers you, there's always the idea of

The rest of your post I'm happy with.

I can't believe my television started talking in your voice as I wrote this. [Roll Eyes]

[ 20.05.2005, 16:56: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
Prof. *** ****** Star Wars Academic - Classy [Big Grin]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
Is Obi-Wan Kenobi 'discovered' by Luke? As I remember it, Obi-Wan happened across Luke in a crumpled state on the rocks after he'd been attacked by a Tusken Raider. I imagine Kenobi sensed Luke's arrival on his doorstep, with an important message from his sister, as the Will of the Force and hence decided to reveal the truth to the boy.



I may be misremembering, but as Ben lies or dissembles about a great deal -- owning a droid, the death of Anakin Skywalker, being taught by Yoda -- it's hard to be sure.

What seems to happen is that Ben is out in that area (Juntland Wastes or something) where he lives, and rescues the boy and his droids from the Sand People just because that's what he'd do. He then seems bemused by the hologram.

Given that Ben knew all the time about Luke and Leia, it seems very odd that he never sensed Luke's attachment to his twin and warned him about it. But no odder than the idea that he didn't realise his Jedi partner was married and shagging.

quote:

And Yoda definitely isn't 'discovered' by Luke. The force-ghost of Obi-Wan Kenobi appeared to Luke on Hoth and said something along the lines of:


Yes, but neither did Yoda bide his time until it was right for him to appear to Luke. He didn't contact Luke, or travel to find him. He stayed where he was until Luke journeyed to Dagobah.

On the other hand, I suppose we can imagine that Yoda communed with Ben in the blue spiritworld of the Force, and told Ben to pass on a message. After all, Yoda is expecting Luke and testing him from the start.


quote:
I can't believe my television started talking in your voice as I wrote this. [Roll Eyes]
Why is everyone watching this programme on its third repeat? It was on last Sunday.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
maybe obi wan isn't that good, or that clever?

or maybe he uses bemused master kung fu style jedi force?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Maybe he got old and rusty out there in the desert for 18 years with no way of practicing his skills.

Anyway Misc, I forgot to say. About your point with the droids. In fact you're wrong and so was I... Droids animated series happens between Episodes III and IV, so apparently they get taken in by Antilles, jet around doing animated stuff, then end up on the same ship or a very similar one, with Antilles, in 18 years.
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
what i wanted to know, and i know this is nit picking, but in what 18-30 years? yoda is suddenly over the age of 900.
how old is he at the end of RoTS and how old when he becomes big blued? and what's the time line.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
896 years before A New Hope
Yoda is born

* really quite depressing timeline actually, because it begins with 1000 years of non-canon nonsense written by nobodies ("Kra't'on Jenn born on Jintfap Tarn, battle of Uitnor Sherr") and ends with 30 years of the same ("Luke's grandson Jicintha fights the 2nd clone Palpatine, with Chewbacca's nephew Jewbocca")
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
with Chewbacca's nephew Jewbocca")

fucking heebs.
eta
so he's 900?
thats it?

"When nine hundred years old, you reach, look as good, you will not." —Yoda

i suppose that should have pointed it out to me.
i thought he was older.

and
WHERE WAS YADDLE?

[ 20.05.2005, 18:37: Message edited by: doc d ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I still didn't see Mon Mothma. The Scotsman had a photo of her in their quiz last week so I was assuming she hadn't been cut.

On second screening I did, however, see Lucas (George and, I think, Jett Lucas) and a Millennium Falcon.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I am really not the geek/expert I was. I am confused about Bail Antilles and Bail Organa, and Captain Antilles [Frown]

quote:
Bail Organa was to have appeared in the Senate sequences of Episode I, though the footage containing him was ultimately edited out of the final film. In the screenplay, Organa seconds Queen Amidala's Vote of No Confidence that topples Supreme Chancellor Valorum's rule. In the resulting power vaccuum, several other senators are nominated to succeed Valorum, including Bail Antilles of Alderaan, who is a separate politician and not intended to be the same character as Bail Organa.


Also about how Bail Organa, as a Viceroy, has an adopted daughter who's a Princess.

And how come there's a ton of info about Mon Mothma, whom I couldn't even see in the film --

quote:

For her small role in Episode III, Mothma was played by Genevieve O'Reilly, who was cast for her resemblance to Blakiston. O'Reilly carefully studied Blakiston's performance to capture Mothma's voice and mannerisms.



but nothing about the Episode III Tarkin?
 
Posted by My Name Is Joe (Member # 530) on :
 
insults
 
Posted by discodamage (Member # 66) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
[
So apart from the effects and I suppose the action, I can't see how this film would work for someone who isn't, to some extent, a "believer" -- who doesn't have some emotional investment in the original series at least.


i was a big believer back in 1984. biiiig. for a girl, immense. but ive not seen the first two because i dont pay money to see films im assured by manifold knowledgable sources are shit. the great thing about media whitewash is that you could very easily pretend youd seen the first two, do a fairly realistic facsimile of the jar-jar wrath and spend the 6 quid on barsnax and lacy primark holdups. but having said that, i have asked someone who has seen both to give me a quick precis of the first two in case i should want to see rots. mainly for the shakeyfist wookies. and because of the lead-in to a new hope. and also, i paid to see constantine on a whim, and so cannot get too self-righteous about people willingly watching toot movies for a while.

[ 20.05.2005, 19:26: Message edited by: discodamage ]
 
Posted by discodamage (Member # 66) on :
 


[ 20.05.2005, 22:45: Message edited by: discodamage ]
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
i put it to you, that you were making nonsense because you qwoir hfpWEIUF
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
sorry i turned all vikram there.


there's not enough wookies discoid.
they lie on the trailers
 
Posted by rooster (Member # 738) on :
 
I have to admit before I post this that I did not read every other post on this thread, but here is my review, which I imagine will contain spoilers:

I am not a hard-core fan, but enough of one to have read some of the books and to have seen the re-release of “A New Hope” more than one time on the same day (I will avoid additional shame by not admitting just how many times I saw it on that day).

I really liked Ep. 1. I loved the visuals – especially of the Senate, and I liked how in Ep. 1 & 2 loose ends were tied up in revelations intertwined with each film’s story. I especially liked the Boba Fett tie in with the clones. The beginning of Ep. 3 on the other hand was a rushed attempt to close as many gaps as possible in way too short a period of time…the quick cuts in the film left me feeling like I was watching a slide show instead of a movie – not the kind of cinematography that belongs in an “epic”.

I don’t feel that Anakin turned to the dark side because of his love and desire for Padme. I believe Ep. 1 revealed fatal flaws in his character before they even became involved. He has a desire to avenge his downtrodden beginnings and prove to himself and others that he is the best. He is greedy, vengeful and full of hubris. This is what makes him susceptible to what Yoda advises against: too strong an attachment to worldly things (including a woman). His feelings for Padme and his turn to the dark side are both symptoms of the same illness of character.

Another thing I didn’t like about Ep. 3 was Padme’s portrayal in general. In 1 & 2 she was a strong character and in 3 she was reduced to Ani’s woman. It was almost as if once they were married their ages were reversed and her only value was in batting eyelashes and birthing children. I was happier as the movie progressed and she started to stand up for herself, but I was very turned off by their first few scenes together.

My heartstrings were tugged effectively at the destruction of the jedi, and the latter scenes of the movie were somewhat redeeming until the first shot of the Vader getup. I agree that Hayden was way too skinny to fill out the evil Vader costume.

Sorry this isn’t much of a review, but I am writing it in the brief time I don’t have the baby attached at the tit – as soon as we have a plasma and all the videos I’ll begin her indoctrination into the ways of the force, yay!
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rooster:
I don’t feel that Anakin turned to the dark side because of his love and desire for Padme. I believe Ep. 1 revealed fatal flaws in his character before they even became involved. He has a desire to avenge his downtrodden beginnings and prove to himself and others that he is the best. He is greedy, vengeful and full of hubris. This is what makes him susceptible to what Yoda advises against: too strong an attachment to worldly things (including a woman). His feelings for Padme and his turn to the dark side are both symptoms of the same illness of character.

Good argument [Cool]
 
Posted by ben (Member # 13) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
I may be misremembering, but as Ben lies or dissembles about a great deal -- owning a droid, the death of Anakin Skywalker, being taught by Yoda -- it's hard to be sure.

W/ reference to the last - maybe the whole character of Qui Gonn Jinn was something (along with 'midichlorians') that Lucas just pulled out of his ass because he couldn't be bothered with having McGregor spend the whole of the first film following a puppet around.

Sam and I ended up watching most of The Phantom Menace when it was on this weekend, breaking off only for Doctor Who. It was striking that a little boy in a gas mask going "Muuuh-meee? Muuuh-meee? Are you my mummy?" was ten times more scary or impressive than anything in the $100m blockbuster.
 
Posted by jnhoj (Member # 286) on :
 
You made your son watch phantom menace? [Wink]

[ 23.05.2005, 04:20: Message edited by: jnhoj ]
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
I'm way behind on Star Wars, you probably know that now. Episode II was on TV last night and, since I didn't really have much else to do and I hadn't seen that one, I gave it a whirl. Well, I missed the first half hour and translated someone's CV while giving the rest a whirl, but at least a fraction of my brain was present. I would now like someone to answer the following questions:


 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
I too watched Phantom, all the way through catching Doctor Who on its Sunday night re-run (Spooky episode - The "Mumm meee, Mumm meee" chant giving me the right willies - As an aside my 9 year old daughter asked me a few weeks ago if I could watch Doctor Who 'later on' as it was making her scared so good job Mr. Russell T Davies)

I enjoyed it more than I did Sith (Which I watched again the night before) and I think I know why..

In Phantom there's a story, in Clones there's a story and no matter how much I hate the Anakin character or think that Hayden’s acting is both wooden and stunted I could still enjoy the story which is what you can't do with Sith. There's no big surprise ending, no shock revelations, no real plot so to speak of (or at least nothing to hold my attention) other than a few non essential fight scenes against Vincent Price and some robots.

We know where it’s going from the outset and we're neither surprised of challenged along the way, the plot is predictable, the acting substandard and over compensated for by special effects and the conclusions drawn sloppy and the ending weak.

There should have been some twist to leave us wanting more (even though there may never be more you always leave them wanting more) rather than the bad taste that Sith left in my mouth..

I also watched the fully remastered DVD version of a new hope, with all the added CGI and switched around shootings it left me feeling more than a little empty, perhaps its time that I just accepted that what made this film for me was that it was part of my childhood and that I am no longer a child. That I love the original because of nostalgia and that now its all bells and whistles its not the same thing I grew up loving - Like the new Raleigh Chopper similar but just a poor reproduction..

And I'd never realized that Luke, Leia and Anakin were HUMAN BEINGS - When was that decided on ?

What are we supposed to be then ? Poor hick relations ? Is there a Battlestar Galactica tie in coming soon ?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ben:
a little boy in a gas mask going "Muuuh-meee? Muuuh-meee? Are you my mummy?"

That frightened the shit out of the Masketeers.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
After watching the recent sp9 of SW documentaries, I've convinced myself that I need to buy those pre- Special Edition videos from Oxfam. I hope they're still in the shop window.

But Star Wars [i(A New Hope)[/i]will never be quite right for me unless it's watched on a home-recorded video tape, complete with mid-80s adverts for Scotch Videos (re-record not fade away) and R. Whites (I'm a secret lemonade drinker) all held together with the TVS ident:
 -

I probably taped Baywatch over it or something. Sigh.
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MiscellaneousFiles:
unless it's watched on a home-recorded video tape, complete with mid-80s adverts for Scotch Videos (re-record not fade away) and R. Whites (I'm a secret lemonade drinker)

Not only did I just do a retrolol, but I'm convinced that we both taped the same shit at the same time of our lives. You'll be telling me you have old recordings of The Jesus & Mary Chain performing Surfing USA on 'The Beat' next.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by New Way Of Decay:
You'll be telling me you have old recordings of The Jesus & Mary Chain performing Surfing USA on 'The Beat' next.

They might have featured on The Beat Christmas Cracker, the VHS recording of which served as my musical bible in my pre-MTV early '90s. Live performances by all kinds of bands Curve, The Auteurs, Belly, PJ Harvey, Stone Temple Pilots, etc... presented by Gary Crowley. Sigh.
 
Posted by Uber Trick (Member # 456) on :
 
My bf bought me a Belly album for my birthday [Smile]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
He must have good taste in music then.

I recently listened to Tanya Donnelly's Whiskey Tango Ghosts which was surprisingly enjoyable. I assumed she'd have softened with age, but she seems just as sharp as she ever was.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
Shouldn't this be in Music?
 
Posted by Vogon Poetess (Member # 164) on :
 
I'm too afeared to play my 1977 version Star Wars cassette, as my ancient VCR is due to die, perhaps with a death wheeze of tape-chewing ferocity, at any moment. So on Friday night I watched the 1997 Ep IV. I'm sorry to report that I didn't have strength of will enough to forget the fact that Vader was once Haydn Christianson, and that did kind of piss on it.

If ROTS really does put the jigsaw pieces together, does it explain one profound mystery: what exactly are Luke's "uncle" and "aunt" farming on Tattoine? Sand?
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
It's a moisture farm I believe.
 
Posted by fish (Member # 22) on :
 
I'm afraid I'm a bit rusty on the original star wars films, having not watched them for about 20 years, but I was a bit surprised to see Padme die at the end of ROTS. No one else has commented on this, and of course I defer entirely to you well studied star wars chaps. Perhaps my memory is playing tricks on me, but in Return of the Jedi don't Luke and Leiah have a conversation that goes along the lines of:
Luke: I don't remember my mother.
Leia: I do.
Luke: Tell me about her.
Leia: She always seemed so... sad.

I "remembered" (or made up?) this little snippet of conversation right at the beginning of watching ROTS - and so I expected Padme to survive... and run away to bring up Leia and be sad. This was kept secret from everyone including Obi Wan which is why he never gave Luke a 'heads up' later on.

Did I just make all that up?

ETA: I went into the cinema fully expecting to hate ROTS, but actually I thoroughly enjoyed it. The only bit I didn't like (and many have mentioned) was the Darth Vader "Noooooooo" scene. Not just him saying it, but the whole waving of arms in the air that accompanies it. Would have been better if they'd got that whole angst thing out of the way before he put the helmet on.

[ 23.05.2005, 08:07: Message edited by: fish ]
 
Posted by mart (Member # 32) on :
 
LUKE
Leia... do you remember your mother?
Your real mother?

LEIA
Just a little bit. She died when I
was very young.

LUKE
What do you remember?

LEIA
Just...images, really.
Feelings.

LUKE
Tell me.

LEIA
She was very beautiful. Kind, but...sad.
Why are you asking me all this?

LUKE
I have no memory of my mother.
I never knew her.
 
Posted by mart (Member # 32) on :
 
Also: how lame was the bit when Palpatatine tells Anakin that "from now on, you will be known as 'Darth... [furrows brow] ...Vader'." No explanation as to whether it actually means anything; he seemed to have made it up on the spot.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
Vader... I always thought of Darth Vader meaning Dark Father what with the Germanic sounding of Vader and the fact that he was the father and Lucas obviously just goes with the most obvious name available at the time of filming..

Is Vader and odder than *Siddious ? or **Maul and why is Dooku (sp) only a Count and not a Darth ?

* adjective taken from insidious ? meaning awaiting a chance to entrap from the latin insidiosus, from insidiae ambush

** transitive verb meaning to handle roughly

Dooku maybe from 'DECOY' from the Dutch "de kooi" meaning literally the cage - Used to trap Anakin ??

The plot thickens...

[ 23.05.2005, 08:28: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darryn.R:
Is Vader and odder than *Siddious ? or **Maul and why is Dooku (sp) only a Count and not a Darth ?

He is also know as Darth Tyrannus. Figure that out...

Might it have something to do with him being a arsehole?

[ 23.05.2005, 08:42: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
I have a pirate copy of Empire Strikes Back from 1982, it's survived with me all this time. I also bought a limited edition (probably limited to only 8,000,000 knowing Lucas) boxed set of the original untampered with trilogy in an Imperial 'flight case' with pictures, scripts and a really, really good making of documentary.

I read somewhere that GL has said that Darth Vader was meant to mean Dark Master - as Anakin was supposed to be the most powerful Jedi or something (the chosen one!). I liked that all the way through the films they kept saying he was the chosen one, but then Yoda just mumbles something about 'maybe we were wrong' and no-one does anything about it. It seemed Yoda knew all along and was just saying 'actually he's a bit of a prick'.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
Tyrannus is actually taken from Tyrannosaurus. This is symbolic for a number of reasons.

The t-rex is the primary logo image for the film Jurassic Park, known more commonly as The Lost World. The lost world in this case referring to Princess Leia's homeworld destroyed in Ep IV.

T-rexs are also extinct - Tyrannus is systematic in the extinction of the Jedi.

Also, as we know, the dinosaurs were wiped out by a meteor impact. Take a look at the Death Star - it has one huge crater in the side which rains destruction upon planets. Coincidence? Unlikely.
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
Rex also means King, as in 'what a fucKING waste of time the first two films were'.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
lol [Wink]
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
What I don't understand is that nobody is giving Anakin much credit at all, when as a small boy he single handedly took out an advancing robot army with enough time to whoop 'yippee'. Anytime he mentions it the rest of the jedi must be like 'shut up you one trick pony'
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Was anyone rooting for the Gungans?
 
Posted by Benny the Ball (Member # 694) on :
 
Were they the Japanese things or the Rasta frogs?
 
Posted by discodamage (Member # 66) on :
 
i watched dirty dancing yesterday! it was as beautiful an experience, especially since i have now seen roadhouse, which truly puts into perspective the enormity of swayze's potential twenty years ago. he could fight sexXxy, he could dance sexXxy, he could sing soulful. what happened? patrick swayze had it all, and midgets- and i use the phrase both literally and metaphorically- like tom cruise still profit in hollywood whilst he lives off residuals? it befuddles me.

i only mention it because when johnny is teaching baby about mambo rhythm, he taps two fingers against the curve of her sweat-slicked left breast and says 'gun-gun... gun-gun...gun-gun'. which sounds a bit like gungan.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
The rasta frogs. One of them had a bit of robot stuck to his leg and every time he fell over he shot a bad guy... it was hilarious.
 
Posted by dang65 (Member # 102) on :
 
It's an epic battle of Daleks vs Light Sabres in our house at the moment. Although the Velociraptors out of Jurassic Park usually have the final say.
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
i saw in good company. it stars mostly dennis quad and damo, but has kovacs fave scarlett johannsen too and that women from excellent species and really dull csi. it was very funny and quite good.


what else? ah yes, team america. was incredibly hilarious. honestly. the chick i saw it with, we were on the bus the day after, and we were talking about it and couldn't stop laughing. my head hurt. highlights: puppet shagging, panther kitties, ultra vomit, blowing up paris. oh, there's too much, it was loltastic.

and matrix revolutions which was even more horrid than first time i saw it. possibly the single most borig and shit film ever made. i can't atually think of anything worse.
 
Posted by vikram (Member # 98) on :
 
um, wrong thread


havent seen the last two star wars and have no intention of seeing this one. it's all wank.


are there any good trilogies?

[ 23.05.2005, 13:20: Message edited by: vikram ]
 
Posted by SilverGinger5 (Member # 49) on :
 
 -
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Fuck. Holiday On The Buses was on the telly not long ago and I watched about an hour of it. It was fascinating. It was, like, anti-comedy. You could see all the things they were doing, the 'sauce', the 'slapstick' were meant to be funny, should've been funny... the things they said followed the familiar patterns of 'jokes', 'puns' and 'one-liners', but... it was not only not funny it made my life bleaker, sadder and more unbearable.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
Re. Leia remembering her mother as beautiful and sad, the theory is now that either Leia was held by Padme and Luke was not, giving the Force-sensitive Leia a stronger psychic impression of her mother, or that Lucas will retcon the inconvenient line from Return of the Jedi.

Re. Anakin being the Chosen One, the prophesy is fulfilled at the end of Return of the Jedi when he kills the Emperor.

Re. Count Dooku, yes as has been pointed out, this is his real name not his Sith title. He is also a "Darth".

Which still doesn't explain why Ben Kenobi calls Vader "Darth" in A New Hope, as if it's a first name. I suppose it could be like saying "you will never understand, Jedi" or "now you die, my Lord" but it's the only occasion where someone uses that word in isolation.
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
Maybe it's sarcasm on Old Bens part. Like 'you sir, are an ass' A bit like calling Damo 'Mr'

Kenoboi is perhaps just ripping the piss at his fancy Sith title.

[ 23.05.2005, 14:49: Message edited by: New Way Of Decay ]
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
Which still doesn't explain why Ben Kenobi calls Vader "Darth" in A New Hope, as if it's a first name. I suppose it could be like saying "you will never understand, Jedi" or "now you die, my Lord" but it's the only occasion where someone uses that word in isolation.

I won't claim to know anything about the history of the whole shebang. But even though GL made the films in a funny order, surely he had the plot going in is head/plans in more or less chronological order? Or not? What I mean is, if calling Vader "Darth" in episode A New Hope were an inconsistency, surely Lucas would have known about it at the time?
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
When Darth Vader says 'I sense a disturbence in the force' as they approach the death star. Surely he should be rolling around on the floor frothing at the vents, spasming slightly as his old master, his son, the droid he built and the servo-bot that saved his life start to dock in a landing bay.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by New Way Of Decay:
When Darth Vader says 'I sense a disturbence in the force' as they approach the death star. Surely he should be rolling around on the floor frothing at the vents, spasming slightly as his old master, his son, the droid he built and the servo-bot that saved his life start to dock in a landing bay

... to rescue his daughter, who he was just torturing.
True seen!

There is some interesting discussion on Barbelith now about how much Lucas knew, or planned. My impression is that his plans for the saga as a whole were pretty sketchy in many respects. I was glancing at The Art of RotS in WH Siths today and apparently Han Solo was scheduled to appear in it, as a scruffy 12 year old who advises Yoda. I will believe that Lucas always had the idea of Anakin being Vader, but I am not totally sold that he'd decided Luke and Leia were siblings, and I think a lot of the prequel content was made up as he went along. In around 1980, I am convinced, he was planning 9 films. The idea that there were only ever going to be 6 films is, I believe, another typical retcon and doublethink. I'm sure he believes it himself but it's odd the way he doesn't realise he's contradicting things he said decades ago.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
... to rescue his daughter, who he was just torturing.
True seen!

They were hiding under the floorboards. It's a well known fact that floorboards block the force.

I heard there were plans for nine films just a few years ago. Not that I have any sources that I would consider reliable. Or even sources that are particuarly interested in Star Wars themselves -- it's just pub-talk. Something about developing the Princess Leia character? Actually, if this is well documented, just say so. Is everything "OK" after Return of the Jedi?
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
I think Lucas embarrasses himself a lot actually, by the constant chopping and changing. I'd heard this aforementioned 9 films too. I reckon he is gonna just end it as he gets older so he can claim it as his legacy. Sadly, he also single handedly killed a lot of the fantasy he created with TPM. Thgen tried to tell a billion fans they were wrong and that it fit into his 'vision' perfectly.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Hopefully, he'll just franchise out the Star Wars mythos and we'll get some decent movies made.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I wonder if he genuinely believes his own contradictions or if he's just hoping that saying it over and over again will convince people they heard wrong the first time. For a guy on the cutting edge of computer technology (in some ways) he seems naive about the fact that his interviews and statements from the last thirty-odd years are still readily available and searchable, and that releasing a DVD with the storyline subtly altered doesn't actually mean all the VHS copies disappear.

I don't think Lucas has ever officially spelled out or even suggested what the final trilogy, VII to IX, would have been about. The Expanded Universe of novels and comics (= EU, for statist and others lucky enough not to know this geekerei; its canonical quality open to question, ie. it is published with Lucasfilm's approval but if Lucas contradicts it in a film, his word goes) has developed the "future" of Star Wars for some 30 years, according to that timeline I linked up. This involves, primarily, Leia and Han marrying and having three children (twins, plus a new Anakin), and Luke starting up a Jedi Academy, and everyone living in the New Republic. As you would expect, there are new challenges and villains, but I haven't found many of these stories especially compelling -- they often seem to involve clones, unfortunately using a technology (Spaarti Cylinders, as I recall) that has no relation to anything we've seen in the prequel movies. For some reason, the clone of Luke is called Luuke or Lluke. I should lluuuke this up, but it is not really worth the compliment of me researching it properly.

Suffice it to say that if you think Lucas' Star Wars is hokey, wooden, stilted and embarrassing, most of the EU makes Revenge of the Sith look like, erm, 2001 or Solaris or the intellectual SF of your choice.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Hopefully, he'll just franchise out the Star Wars mythos and we'll get some decent movies made.

I'd really like to see a feature version of my home-made Star Wars: Revenge of the Jedi comic book from 1980, actually. It is dead good. The Rebels move camp again to a planet called Kragg (it's entirely rocky -- just like Geonosis in Episode II -- scoreboard, bitch), Han Solo is pursued by a bounty hunter called Hassag Gunn (no worse than "Nute Gunray" surely) and the final duel between Luke and Vader pivots on Kenobi appearing as a Force spirit. Vader is startled by the return of his old adversary, turns his back on Luke ("I'll deal with YOU later") and the young Jedi cuts down the Dark Lord from behind!

[ 23.05.2005, 15:46: Message edited by: kovacs ]
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
For some reason, the clone of Luke is called Luuke or Lluke.

Sadly [Embarrassed] I did it for you and although I found nothing exciting, i did find a girl who wants to be Mara Jade:

 -
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
More than you ever wanted to know about lightsabers *

I mean, apparently Leia has half a dozen [Confused]

quote:
Luuke Skywalker, Cloned Dark Jedi (Originally Built by Anakin Skywalker & Owned by Luke Skywalker)

 -

Originally constructed by Anakin Skywalker. After Luke Skywalker lost his hand along with his lightsaber in the shafts of Cloud City on Bespin, the Jedi Master Joruus C'baoth, a clone himself, found the hand and saber. He took cells from the hand and cloned Luke. He then gave the saber to him to train him as a Dark Jedi. He was eventually killed by Mara Jade, fulfilling her last command of the Emperor, "Kill Skywalker". After the death of the clone Luuke, Luke Skywalker retook possession of his former weapon and gave it to Mara Jade to help complete her training as a Jedi.
Saber Source: The Last Command



[ 23.05.2005, 16:25: Message edited by: kovacs ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
darth lolus

apparently the first sabers were like 1980s mobile phones... massive and clunky with an unwieldy power pack!

 -

This unit comprised of a separate hip power pack, power line and saber hilt. Some of the unique features of this lightsaber is that they were typically carved from duranium. Making this a truly hand crafted weapon of the Jedi or Sith. The crystals used for these were also very crude and typically exposed.
Saber Source: Tales of the Jedi

 
Posted by Jessica Rabbit (Member # 776) on :
 
I watched Star Wars Episode III: Return of the Sith last night and I really liked it. Kovacs' woman who watched them all in chronological (ie: wrong) order will have missed much. For me, a great deal of the power of the film comes from the bitter knowledge that no matter how much these characters attempt to change their fates, there's nothing that can be done. I never really got the impression they were supposed to be watched Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace -Star Wars: Episode VI: A New Hope. And, really they're not - the prequels were clearly designed to entertain audiences who were familiar with the later episodes.

Also, much as I liked the final Anakin/Obi-Wan smackdown, I couldn't help but think they were a lot less athletic when they meet on the Death Star in Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope. I guess they both kind of got old, huh. Maybe they should re-do this duel in Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope. They could easily map Alec Guinness's face onto - say - Vin Diesel's body and re-film the fight to bring it up to standard. They should definitely do that.

[ 23.05.2005, 16:49: Message edited by: Jessica Rabbit ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jessica Rabbit:
I never really got the impression they were supposed to be watched Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace -Star Wars: Episode VI: A New Hope. And, really they're not - the prequels were clearly designed to entertain audiences who were familiar with the later episodes.

Also a good argument, and also there's a debate strand on Barbelith along these lines. Someone on that board is taking pleasure in, well, imagining really, that Chewbacca recognises Ben Kenobi, or his name, or his Jedi status, and persuades Han to take them to Alderaan because he remembers how Yoda was pals with the Wookiees 18 years before.

But really, Chewbacca being named in Episode III has nothing to do with us recognising him again in episode IV... that would just be pointless and baffling. Imagine the chronological, naive viewer watching the films in order. Yoda says goodbye to Chewbacca on Kashyyyk (sp). NEXT FILM: much later in a totally different part of the galaxy, "Chewbacca here is first mate on a ship that might suit us." What the fuck, it's the Wookiee who saved Yoda. Well, there'll be some reference back to that, then... some context about how Chewbacca ended up on Tatooine with a human (Corellian) pirate. Some conversation about what happened to Yoda, as the Wookiee would surely ask a Jedi about the purge and Order 66. No... just some haggling over prices, and then Ben Kenobi and Chewbacca basically ignore each other for the rest of the film, both their memories apparently wiped.

NO:
The naming of Chewbacca in Episode III is a little pleasure-burst cameo for anyone who has seen the original trilogy and was too dumb to recognise him by sight.
 
Posted by Ringo (Member # 47) on :
 
Theory - could it be that Lucas is actually engineering inconsistencies and plot holes merely to stir up controversy and help publicise his movie franchise?
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
***Get closer to God - Watch Star Wars!

 -

quote:
'Star Wars' was the first movie Russell Smith ever saw in a theater.

Twenty-eight years later, as pastor of Covenant-First Presbyterian Church, downtown, Smith was an easy sell when asked whether his church would host a Bible study entitled "Gospel According to Star Wars."

"This is our language. We grew up with this," said Smith, 33, pastor at the church for four years. "With this study, we're saying there are hints of truth, beauty and goodness in the story that can bring us back to the biblical story."


 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I think it's a sign of something about SW's cultural importance that the thread's so long and involved.

Anyway, another question. The opening scroll: "War!" etc. "There are heroes on both sides," it reads, as I recall. "Evil is everywhere."

Is this properly thought through? Heroes on both sides. The two sides are the Jedi, with their Clone army, and the Separatists (Trade Federation, Nemoidians and so on), right?

So there are really heroes among the Charlie Chan aliens and the roger-roger robots?

And is there really evil everywhere? 90% of both armies are droids and clones... mindless automatons. The only evil, really, is Palpatine and Dooku.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
So there are really heroes among the Charlie Chan aliens and the roger-roger robots?

General Grievous could be considered a hero among droids, but I agree that it's a confusing way to start the film.

quote:

And is there really evil everywhere? 90% of both armies are droids and clones... mindless automatons. The only evil, really, is Palpatine and Dooku.

You could say that the droids and clones (after 66) are agents of evil as they are spreading death and destruction (evil things?) across the galaxy, albeit under the control of the true master of evil - Sidious.

[ 24.05.2005, 08:03: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
The clones are pawns of Sith evil, but only two thirds of the way through the film, not at the time of the opening crawl. The droids really are mindless and in any case, their masters aren't evil really -- the Trade Federation are greedy and foolish.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
The droids really are mindless and in any case, their masters aren't evil really -- the Trade Federation are greedy and foolish.

But who is controlling and influencing the Trade Federation?

Darth 'Evil' Sidious!
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Revenge of the Cretins
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Revenge of the Cretins

I want to see the tape. It sounds cool.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
I think it's a sign of something about SW's cultural importance that the thread's so long and involved.

Yes. If you like I'll make it more culturally important with a useful aside:

Fett is the Swedish translation of the English word fat (the noun, not the adjective). And sometimes Swedes get a bit confused. Some time ago I heard someone talking about Star-Wars (in English) about a character called Bobba Fat, assuming that Fat was translated to Fett in the Swedish subtitling. No serious, it's true. Mail me if you want to write about that in your next book, I can provide more details! [Wink] Cool, huh?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Chewbacca in Finnish means 'angry hair'. I think we all know where he's coming from, right readers?
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Revenge of the Cretins

Beautiful. And reminds me of yet another interesting aside. Sky magazine once approached someone I know to write a piece about how scientifically feasible it is to actually make a light sabre. He was a researcher in astrophysics at Leeds University when I was a student there, the article was called Science Dad or something. And he was going on with all this ionise the gas, contain the plasma in a magnetic field, really big fucking laser, etc. I wish he had just said fill a fluorescent tube with petrol and light it. That would have been so much better.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
I wish he had just said fill a fluorescent tube with petrol and light it. That would have been so much better.

But imagine if that's what they'd used in the Star Wars saga...
quote:
Ben hands Luke the saber.

LUKE: What is it?

BEN: Your father's lightsaber. This is the weapon of a Jedi Knight. Not as clumsy or as random as a blaster.

Luke pushes a button on the handle. A long beam shoots out about four feet and flickers there. The light plays across the ceiling.

BEN: An elegant weapon for a more civilized time. For over a thousand generations the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic. Before the...

The Lightsaber explodes, casting metal and flame into Luke's face and torso, killing him instantly.

BOOOOOOM!

BEN: Luke? LUKE...?!

Oh shaft. I just blew up the last hope for peace in the galaxy.


 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
You think they might have had a bit of a practice with a couple of empty fluorescent tubes first.

Oh dear. When we bang them together they explode in a puff of shattering glass fragments... maybe we should skip the petrol and go back to the drawing board?
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
LOL, Misc.

But, I didn't mean for the films -- obviously it's fine to do that with felt-tip pens.

But the thing is, if you talk about plasma confinement fields and lasers and shit, people will just give up immediately. Whereas, if they think a lightsabre is something they could create with a few household objects, then they're much more likely to give it a shot. And if a few Sky magazine-reading knobheads get taken out at the same time, where's the loss?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Just imagine if they'd tried to make a Death Star...
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
Ha! here he is.

Although it says Sky magazine here (and that's what I said too), there is some speculation that it may acutally have been FHM and it may have been called Boffin Dad. Chinese fucking whispers.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Just imagine if they'd tried to make a Death Star...

Easy. You just hire a lot of contractors.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
And if a few Sky magazine-reading knobheads get taken out at the same time, where's the loss?

Fascinating Facked:
The cover of the monthly Sky magazine, if torn correctly, provides exactly the right amount of paper to make a months worth of roaches.

As far as I can tell, that's its only purpose.
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
*World's most powerful laser. Death Star next?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Rather more mundane... DREAD
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Advice needed!

The Masketeers are pestering me to take them to see the Sith during half-term. How scary/bloody is the movie?
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
It's got a lot of hand chopping off, Anakins legs off could worry young children (under say 8) and the Emp is a bit spooky after he goes all manky in the fight..
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Hmmm... I might have to give it a miss. It's creepiness and suffering that bother them most. They've seen the cantina dismemberment and the Darth Maul cutting-in-two dozens of times and think stuff like that is either cool or funny or both. But, Dr Who's gas-mask people frightened the shit out of them on Saturday. I suppose I could go and see it without them first.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
I think you'll be OK really, if they can deal with cut up its OK, the Anakin legs off and screaming is a bit much though..

If there was any way of doing it I'd get a copy of it to you for 'review' so you can see what you think..

When's half term ?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Half term's next week. The screaming may be a no-no. I took them to the Saturday morning pictures a few months back and 'Thunderpants' was on. It opens with a woman very noisily giving birth. We had to leave in a hurry. And, we have to fast-forward through the bit in X-Men 2 where the kid gets shot in the neck with a tranquiliser dart.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
maybe not a good idea then..
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Oh, well... the zoo it is.
 
Posted by Darryn.R (Member # 1) on :
 
I can still pop BIRTHDAY CARD in the mail in the morning..

Just mail me

[ 24.05.2005, 11:23: Message edited by: Darryn.R ]
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
Weather permitting.

[ 24.05.2005, 11:24: Message edited by: Black Mask ]
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Black Mask:
Half term's next week. The screaming may be a no-no. I took them to the Saturday morning pictures a few months back and 'Thunderpants' was on. It opens with a woman very noisily giving birth. We had to leave in a hurry. And, we have to fast-forward through the bit in X-Men 2 where the kid gets shot in the neck with a tranquiliser dart.

I don't know much about you, Mask. You may or may not have said these things in the past. But I will extrapolate just a little with the following assumptions.

Conclusion: there is a 1-(0.5^3) = 87.5% chance that Black Mask is a big girl's blouse.

[ 24.05.2005, 11:30: Message edited by: statist ]
 
Posted by dang65 (Member # 102) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
Conclusion: there is a 1-(0.5^3) = 87.5% chance that Black Mask is a big girl's blouse.

At least he doesn't let his wife dictate whether he can wear a hat or not.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dang65:
At least he doesn't let his wife dictate whether he can wear a hat or not.

Touché. What's it to you?

Cool -- that reminds me of how I was directed to SeeThru. Someone sent me a link to this bizarre 'am I wearing a hat or not' thing.
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 

 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
I stand corrected. Reduce that to 75%.

Sorry, it's really slow going today.
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
I think you're actually a creepy ex-lurker, Statist. It's really quite rude and antisocial to hang around a community for years, then decide to post and act all familiar & knowing with the people you've been watching. You don't join a group of friends and start acting unnervingly pally with people you just met, or referring to stuff you spied on through the window in 2003 cause you didn't have the gumption to come join the party. All this name and event-dropping you do is deliberate, wryly superior performance.

You are barely a stage up from dopey characters who call themselves "The Observer" or "The Truth" and announce that they're going to offer their judgements on various forum characters.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
You are barely a stage up from dopey characters who call themselves "The Observer" or "The Truth" and announce that they're going to offer their judgements on various forum characters.

It's not a judgement. It's a pointless analysis, a statement of assumptions, and a silly attempt to extrapolate further information. And a flawed one at that. One that could be made by anyone who has read only this thread, regardless of how long they have been around for or lurked. One I begin by stating that I don't know anything about Black Mask. And in addition, I wouldn't argue that I was any stage above the characters you mentioned. Note: Member ratings are not currently permitted on this message board.

Of my assumptions, two at least were wrong. There may be something strange about it from your perspective, but I'm not certain creepy is exactly the right word. If you find it creepy then I guess it is, of course.

Personally, I don't see much difference between someone lurking for an arbitrary period of time before beginning posting, and some long-term poster going "fuck that, I'm beginning a new identity". They are both new from the perspective of everyone who hasn't changed identity, although they know the same stuff. Maybe you will spot the identity switch or maybe not.

EDITed for the following (and other things):

quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
All this name and event-dropping you do is deliberate, wryly superior performance.

I was a bit put out by this initially. But after having thought about it, I have thought of several, perhaps too many, instances in which I have done this. It is indeed deliberate, or at least in the dominant proportion -- especially when comparing the word deliberate with the word accidental -- but I can assure you it's not about superiority (at least not in the dominant proportion).

[ 24.05.2005, 12:46: Message edited by: statist ]
 
Posted by scrawny (Member # 113) on :
 
Still beats the pants off anyone who hangs around for five minutes, starts a thread entitled 'HIYA!!!@$#' and then fucks off equally quickly following a minimal posting career and a massive flame war.
 
Posted by New Way Of Decay (Member # 106) on :
 
Don't worry about Kovacs statist, he shits a brick if he thinks anyone remembers anything longer than 6 months ago. He's closer to his friend Lucas than he cares to think. Technically he's closer to characters like The Truth, because you've only ever showed up in one guise.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scrawny:
Still beats the pants off anyone who hangs around for five minutes, starts a thread entitled 'HIYA!!!@$#' and then fucks off equally quickly following a minimal posting career and a massive flame war.

Heh. I'm sitting at work now and it's 18:59. I should be on my way home but that'll take me 45 minutes. But I don't want to leave because I'm still waiting for the follow-up berating. If I leave now, it will come immediately and, by the time I get home and have my dinner, it have been taken apart by other posters, reinforced, recapitulated and commented on, and I won't be able to put it back together again.

I can assure you I won't be getting involved in any flame wars. Unless I'm really sure of my footing, that is.

I'm taking the 19:10 bus. Hope I don't have to wait too long for the subway.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by New Way Of Decay:
Don't worry about Kovacs statist, he shits a brick if he thinks anyone remembers anything longer than 6 months ago.

Dude, you don't have to tell me that!

[ 24.05.2005, 13:06: Message edited by: statist ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
But I don't want to leave because I'm still waiting for the follow-up berating. If I leave now, it will come immediately...

quote:

I'm taking the 19:10 bus.

Right then.

Over to you, Kovacs.

[ 24.05.2005, 13:18: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
Personally, I don't see much difference between someone lurking for an arbitrary period of time before beginning posting, and some long-term poster going "fuck that, I'm beginning a new identity". They are both new from the perspective of everyone who hasn't changed identity, although they know the same stuff. Maybe you will spot the identity switch or maybe not.

Yeah, and both are creepy.

I don't need to "follow up", as I said what I wanted to.
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
But you lurked, Kovacs - between September 2000 and January 2001, when you started posting. You were quite proud of the fact, as I recall, and used to mention it whenever people would say that you weren't entitled to get in arguments because you were just a 'newbie'.

(Admittedly, you lurked for three months. And Statist has lurked for three years. But he's started posting now! He just needs to post for, hmmm... nine more years - and everything will be ok!)

[ 24.05.2005, 15:14: Message edited by: London ]
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by London:

(Admittedly, you lurked for three months. And Statist has lurked for three years. But he's started posting now! He just needs to post for, hmmm... nine more years - and everything will be ok!)

You answered your own objection. [Cool]
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
I don't know quite how to go about this. I'm really really not looking for an argument. Really really. But I'm in an odd state. Somewhere between knowing and not knowing which I have brought on myself – of course you don't have to help me. But as a long-time lurker, one picks up the big picture. It's the intricacies that are all lost. As in, you may learn something by watching the Discovery Channel for hours on end but nothing concrete, nothing really valuable due to your lack of participation, or whatever. Passive learning doesn't work, bla bla.

Firstly, perhaps I should apologise for the “follow up berating” comment. It was kind of weak, actually. Maybe nerves since I did expect a laying into. Maybe some passive-aggressive technique (is it?) by which I was kind of letting you know that I was waiting for you to have a bit of a go at me, but also playing to the forum at the same time. I dunno. Some misguided preemptive strike maybe.

But thinking about that kind of got me thinking about your comments – perhaps this is something I would have picked up better if I had lurked more, or found out via the more usual mechanisms had I not lurked at all. Something was bugging me:

quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
You don't join a group of friends and start acting unnervingly pally with people you just met, or referring to stuff you spied on through the window in 2003 cause you didn't have the gumption to come join the party.

I don't like the analogy but it played in my head I kind feel I have to ask you about it. Is this a double argument? (is that what it's called? -- probably it has a better name.) OK, now I'm going to make the creepy thing a lot worse. I haven't read any you have written off the forum so I will speculate: at some level or other, you are interested in comparing online to real-life interaction?
Those analogies look fine on the surface. And maybe they are fine, I'm just going to comment. The part about spying through the window, I have a bit of an issue with. This I kind of feel is also playing to the forum somewhat – perhaps there's a term for this as well, particularly in a court or something. The point is that spying through a window, as a particular example, more or less implies something illegal. Something that is actually wrong. Whereas lurking a forum to some extent is something that is expected. (I am not talking about being overly pally with posters now, that's something different). Admittedly there is a great difference between lurking for a week and 3 years. But certainly it's not against the rules. Or is it? The reasoning being to acclimatise, not to find out everything about the posters, I guess that's the difference. But spying through a window? Not having the gumption to join the party? Like you said, I guess that's, at least in part, what you wanted to say. But as I said my issue was more with the analogy, feeling that it was also an attack. Surely, the logical response would be to say just what I have done but to also to add something like “you of all people should know that”. You know, pointing out that I know about your interests in online interaction. And thereby lending weight to your point about it/me being creepy. Do you see what I mean? It's an issue I couldn't possibly comment on without making things worse for myself.

Crap. Sorry. Read the first lines of the post again. Not looking for an argument. Honestly.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by London:
(Admittedly, you lurked for three months. And Statist has lurked for three years. But he's started posting now! He just needs to post for, hmmm... nine more years - and everything will be ok!)

I would be accpted, if only I could forget what I know.

Nine years? Easy. Say I post twice as frequently as I need to for 4.5 years? Would that be OK?
 
Posted by kovacs (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
at some level or other, you are interested in comparing online to real-life interaction?



I don't really have a professional interest in it, and for you to think that I do reveals some of the strangeness in your knowledge of TMO -- namely, that it's got trace elements of SEETHRU in it. I mean, analysing online communities is something me and London used to talk about in 2001 or something.

I wouldn't say now that there's any point treating online and real life interaction as separate worlds -- I think they are virtually the same thing, in that online interaction is real life people talking on a network. I wouldn't make a distinction between real life and "the virtual space of telephone calls" either.


quote:
The part about spying through the window, I have a bit of an issue with. This I kind of feel is also playing to the forum somewhat – perhaps there's a term for this as well, particularly in a court or something.


Too fucking true! But that is one of the key traits of my arguing strategy on here: playing to the court, not just trying to engage with the single person you're talking to. I guess it is a kind of rhetoric.


quote:

The point is that spying through a window, as a particular example, more or less implies something illegal. Something that is actually wrong. Whereas lurking a forum to some extent is something that is expected.

... But spying through a window? Not having the gumption to join the party? Like you said, I guess that's, at least in part, what you wanted to say. But as I said my issue was more with the analogy, feeling that it was also an attack.




Well, in simple terms:

I was annoyed with what had built up for me into a general, irritating picture of this persona-trait in you, and which your interaction with BM reminded me of.

So, of course I constructed an analogy that made you look specially bad. The importance here wasn't accuracy -- it was making you look creepy through a "real-world" comparison.

Bear in mind also though that I wrote that post quickly so didn't think through the analogy, really. It was just meant to give the connotation "creepy... cowardly."

However, I really have no bad feeling toward you, Statist. In fact, your follow-up posts here have been honest, self-searching and intelligent. I do think you weren't doing yourself a favour (in my eyes at least) by seeming knowing and over-familiar through your lurking for so fucking long, and I don't understand lurking for so long... it must be like watching a soap for years then getting a job as an actor in it (analogy). But if you address that and are aware of it, then it's less of a problem for me.
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kovacs:
(analogy)

Actually, I don't...Nah.

I have just been to the bathroom, only to discover two new grey hairs. In my head while, looking in the mirror on the way out, in case anyone was wondering. I blame this thread. The one at the front was not problem, he came out immediately. But the one at the side kept disappearing in the light every time I tried to grab it. Fuck.
 
Posted by London (Member # 29) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:

Nine years? Easy. Say I post twice as frequently as I need to for 4.5 years? Would that be OK?

It might help. I think also you should tell them the thing about the hat. I think they're getting antsy.

[ 25.05.2005, 04:23: Message edited by: London ]
 
Posted by statist (Member # 806) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by London:
It might help. I think also you should tell them the thing about the hat. I think they're getting antsy.

I would do that but due to (a) fucking around far too much over the last week and (b) having a minor, although accidental, break-through this morning, I have decided to devote (almost) the rest of the day to actually producing something useful.
Now that the hat thing has been blown way out of proportion, I will have to come up with a suitably convincing but amusing lie to explain it. Which I can't do today becuase (a) there is no time, see above, and (b) I only got 2.5 hours sleep last night and am v.v. tired. I will probably find time to post shit comments though.

Perhaps ignoring the hat thing was not the right thing to do.

Looks like I'm on course for 9 years after all. Or maybe even more.

[ 25.05.2005, 05:07: Message edited by: statist ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by statist:
I have decided to devote (almost) the rest of the day to actually producing something useful.

Does this mean that we can look forward to a cornucopia of Grade-A threads, or are you referring to something outside of the forum?
 
Posted by Black Mask (Member # 185) on :
 
mad skillz
 
Posted by doc d (Member # 781) on :
 
that so looks like the shit my roommate pulls.
 
Posted by Boy Racer (Member # 498) on :
 
Having seen RotS last Friday and subsequently read Peter Bradshaw's review I have to say I largely agree with his verdict on the film, although I'd add that the whole transformation sequence was spoiled for me by the fact that at the end of it Darth Vader was quite clearly not Darth Vader (i.e Dave Prowse) but, tragically, Hayden Christensen in platforms.

To be fair, there were some other aspects of the film that weren’t entirely awful, Ian McDiarmid inparticular was typically good value as Palpatine/Sidious, and I thought the ‘Execute Order 66’ sequence was nicely operatic and Godfatherly.

But for me the moribund denseness of the entire experience of ‘...Sith’ in terms both of plot and visually was stifling, in a way that worked against the story rather than in it’s favour.

I regard myself as a Star Wars fan, but unlike VP I wasn’t wholly against the greater development of Anakin/Vader’s backstory, although I do think VP has a point about the demystification of ideas from the originals films in the prequels, see inparticular the whole Midiclurians(sic?) nonsense. I don’t think that the successful telling of the Anakin to Vader story would have detracted from my experience of the original trilogy, however given it’s tragically shoddy execution, I’d much rather the prequels simply didn’t exist.

[ 26.05.2005, 05:45: Message edited by: Boy Racer ]
 
Posted by MiscellaneousFiles (Member # 60) on :
 
I might have already mentioned this rather odd example of Star Wars merchandise.

Darth Tater

 -

A * teacher in Seattle recently asked his class to come up with SW/potato-related puns (standards slipping?)
I thought I would share the results with you:

"May the forks be with you" by Emily
"Luke Fry-walker" by Ben and Joseph
"The Refry of the Jedi" by Henry
"I will not farm you father" by Henry
"It's your father's light flavor" by Emily
"Mash Windu" by Luke G.
"Asteroids do not concern me, Admiral. I want that chip, not excuses" by Mr. Miller
"If only you knew the power of the deep fried" by Mr. Miller
"Trust your peelings" by Emily
"Luke, I have drained you well" by Lea

Can you come up with something better?

[ 27.05.2005, 05:23: Message edited by: MiscellaneousFiles ]
 


copyright TMO y2k+

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.6.1