posted
maybe this is it, ben. This thread is the end result of six years of internet posting. All that toil and care, the arguing, the weaving of landscapes and the painting of poetry. This is our gift to you: A couple of muted lols.
Posts: 4376
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by vikram: i think i'd enjoy bentopia. he'd place me into a position of power, like caligula and his horse
Vikram - would you change your name to Inchytatus?
ETA - fact fans - Caligula was a nick name - meaning 'little boots' that Caligula acquired because when he was an infant he spent a lot of time in army camps with his dad, dressed in a full uniform - how cute!
[ 06.06.2007, 06:04: Message edited by: Benny the Ball ]
-------------------- If Chuck Norris is late, time better slow the fuck down Posts: 2739
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Black Mask: What would the Post-Zed world look like, fashioned, as it will inevitably be, by ben's cruel hand?
Describe, if you can, that startling new dawn...
I think Bentopia would have a hard time existing as much of the ben vision is defined by being in opposition to the status quo, so bentopia would be a world in constant crisis, continuously trying to re-invent itself to be precisely what it is not. The dominiant cultural form becomes euro-art-horror movies, so people who like euro-art-horror are idiot cattle, and the cultural template has to change again. Actually, as I write this, I think maybe Bentopia wouldn't be so bad - it might even be the kind of place Aristotle would have dreamed about where the dominant stereotypes of behaviour are precisely the ones people are not able to fall back on; with their assumptions obliterated people would have no choice but to carve out identities that are exclusively their own, rather than based on prescriptive modes of behaviour. So. Yes, Aristotle would like it, but I probably wouldn't because I like dressing as a metaller. Also, you probably need systems and codes of behaviour that are perpetually reinforced by popular storytelling and semiotics and things in order to really get anything done.
posted
If anyone's wondering, I've been in contact with the NSPCC and according to amendment 00.015 it is ok to punch that kid.
Posts: 1641
| IP: Logged
posted
nice work. Not the face though. I couldn't punch a kid in the face. But maybe really hard in the stomach so he doubles over and starts weeping.
Posts: 4376
| IP: Logged
posted
I'd quite like to do some wrestling moves, like pic him up and lift him above my head spin him round a few times and then just throw him as far as I could. You could do it because he'd be quite light. Or you could do the same thing with a midget that annoyed you for example.
Posts: 1641
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Tilde: I'd quite like to do some wrestling moves, like pic him up and lift him above my head spin him round a few times and then just throw him as far as I could. You could do it because he'd be quite light. Or you could do the same thing with a midget that annoyed you for example.
Midgets are much denser than children. More muscle mass, see? You can throw a kid quite far.
quote:Originally posted by doc d: could you have a midget Galileo Thermometer using a range of different sized midgets/small people and a swimming pool?
Not in bentopia, you couldn't. That would be unethical.
quote:Originally posted by Nathan Bleak: Actually, as I write this, I think maybe Bentopia wouldn't be so bad - it might even be the kind of place Aristotle would have dreamed about where the dominant stereotypes of behaviour are precisely the ones people are not able to fall back on; with their assumptions obliterated people would have no choice but to carve out identities that are exclusively their own, rather than based on prescriptive modes of behaviour.
By sick coincidence I'm currently trying to read Plato's Republic. I say 'trying to read' as it's one of those books where you can physically look at all the words contained in a dozen succeeding pages before you're brought up short by the depressing thought that you haven't understood much more than one line out of five hundred.
From what I can make out, Plato seems to advocate banning all poetry (fine) apart from self-aggrandising tosh (so, basically, Jay-Z and Fiddy and that sort of thing) and army training consisting of a good balance of gymnastics and music - which I imagine would result in ninjas high-kicking to the sound of that Propellerheads track from The Matrix.
There's some good, nasty stuff about how a just society can only really fuction if it's run by a wise few (as opposed to 'the many' which he disparages pretty frequently) and how successful societies need a 'noble lie' to animate them and give the guardians of that society something around which to unite. In our own society, for example, the dominant (noble?) lie seems to be something about 'choice' - it's certainly the word that crops up most frequently in speeches by leaders from Thatcher, through Blair, to Cameron and Brown.
As I say, I don't really feel I'm grasping a lot of it, but Plato's compulsion to question all assumptions - and the assumptions that underpin those assumptions - is probably somethng to be admired. I can certainly understand why the Athenians felt the need to execute his forbear, Socrates.
Anyway, you seem to know what you're talking about, Thorn - I hereby appoint you my Minister of Thinking.
posted
Fuck it. I actually meant Socrates, not Aristotle. I don't even know what Aristotle done. Socrates was the one that kept asking irritating questions to chip away at people's assumptions. What an embarassing error.
-------------------- Now that you've called me by name? Posts: 2007
| IP: Logged
posted
O wait - according to The Wicked Paedo, Aristotle thought along the same lines, and gets lumped into the same club as Plato and Socrates. Phew! I reckon I should get away with that blunder as long as no-one reads my other posts (I think you could be in luck, Nathan - ed)
-------------------- Now that you've called me by name? Posts: 2007
| IP: Logged
posted
I wonder if modern Greeks are ever ashamed of themselves when compared to their ancestors? 3000 years ago they had the greatest thinkers who had ever lived on their team. They invented civilisation. Their philosophy pretty much defined the Western world, and many of their writings are still relevant today. Nowadays what do they offer the planet? Kebabs that sit in your gut like liquid clay, liver-melting Ouzo, and grinning immigrant criminals. From the calm dignity of the thinkers in their togas, to the blunt savagery of the bullying landlord with checked jacket stretched across his massive shoulders in 3000 years. A true Greek tragedy.
-------------------- Now that you've called me by name? Posts: 2007
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Nathan Bleak: grinning immigrant criminals
I tried Googling for an image of Snorton to juxtapose with this comment and, as well as finding that his design website now has a 'werewolf' theme, I discovered to my dismay that the author pages of his 'Panzer Ace' site are blocked by my employer's monitoring software. I wonder which category they come under: